Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37126384›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2023

Co-created Technological Solutions for Caregivers in Health Care: Systematic Review.

Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza, Cristina Borralleras Andreu, Eduard Minobes-Molina, Sergi Grau Carrión, Montse Romero-Mas, Anna Ramon-Aribau

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza *Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6893-952X
Cristina Borralleras Andreu *Digital Care Research Group, Faculty of Science, Technology and Engineering, Centre for Health and Social Care Research, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4667-0953
Eduard Minobes-MolinaMethodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0457-2503
Sergi Grau CarriónDigital Care Research Group, Faculty of Science, Technology and Engineering, Centre for Health and Social Care Research, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1927-0476
Montse Romero-MasMethodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8079-1433
Anna Ramon-AribauMethodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3303-9932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupport interventions for caregivers can reduce their stress, possibly improving the quality of patients' care while reducing care costs. Technological solutions have been designed to cover their needs, but there are some challenges in making them truly functional for end users. Co-design approaches present important opportunities for engaging diverse populations to help ensure that technological solutions are inclusive and accessible.

objectiveThis study aimed to identify co-created technological solutions, as well as the process followed for their co-creation, in the field of health for caregivers.

methodsThe literature review was conducted in the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Scielo, and IEEE Xplore databases. The inclusion criteria were studies written in English or Spanish and with a publication date until May 2021. The content had to specify that the caregivers actively participated in the co-creation process, which covered until the development phase of the technological solution (prototype). The level of evidence and the methodological quality were analyzed when possible, using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, version 2018, respectively.

resultsIn total, 410 papers were identified, and 11 met the eligibility criteria. The most predominant articles were mixed methods studies and qualitative studies. The technology used in the analyzed articles were mobile or web applications (9 studies) and specific devices such as sensors, cameras, or alarm systems (2 studies) to support the health and social aspects of caregivers and improve their education in care. The most common patient profile was older people (7 studies); 6 studies used co-creation in the requirements phase, 6 studies detailed the design phase. In 9 studies, the prototype was iteratively refined in the development phase, and the validation phase was performed in 5 of the reviewed studies.

conclusionsThis systematic review suggests that existing co-created technological solutions in the field of health for caregivers are mostly mobile or web applications to support caregivers' social health and well-being and improve their health knowledge when delivering care to patients, especially older people. As for the co-creation process, caregivers are particularly involved during development and in the design. The scarce literature found indicates that further research with higher methodological quality is needed.

Indexed as

CaregiversDelivery of Health CareAgedHumanscaregiversco-creationhealth caremobile applicationssystematic reviewtechnological solutions

Identifiers

PMID37126384
PMCPMC10186187

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.