Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37147767›Full record

ArticleJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2023

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation would be an alternative to implantable cervical vagus nerve stimulation in some situation.

H E Jiakai, Zhang Jinling, Wang Yu, L I Shaoyuan, Fang Jiliang, Zhang Shuai, Zhao Yanan, Zhai Weihang, Gao Deqiang, L I Ran and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H E JiakaiDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Zhang JinlingDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Wang YuDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
L I ShaoyuanDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Fang JiliangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Zhang ShuaiDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Zhao YananDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Zhai WeihangDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Gao DeqiangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
L I RanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Jiang YuhangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Chen ZehaoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Jia BaohuiDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Rong PeijingDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantable cervical vagus nerve stimulation (iVNS) is a representative and promising neuromodulation. However, the invasive nature restricts its application. Traditional auricular acupuncture treatment has a long history. The auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) is a branch on the surface of the ear. Some studies demonstrates that transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) would achieve similar effects as iVNS. TaVNS and iVNS share a common anatomical basis and acting mechanism. In this article, we made a comparison between iVNS and taVNS in indications and efficacy. The recent studies have revealed similar clinical efficacy of taVNS, taVNS would expand the indication of iVNS. High-quality clinical evidences are needed before taVNS become be an alternative of iVNS.

Indexed as

Acupuncture, EarTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationVagus Nerve StimulationHumansTreatment OutcomeVagus Nerveauricular branch of vagus nerveefficacyneuromodulationtranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37147767
PMCPMC10133952
OpenAlexW4372336313

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.