ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2023
Characterization of diffusion MRI using the mean apparent propagator model in hemodialysis patients: A pilot study.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing brain microstructural changes in chronic kidney disease: a diffusion imaging study using multiple models.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Markov model combined with MR diffusion tensor imaging for predicting the onset of Alzheimer's disease.Open life sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To better understand documented cognitive decline in hemodialysis (HD) patients, diffusion MRI (dMRI) has been used to characterize brain anatomical deficits relative to controls. Studies to this point have primarily used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to model the three-dimensional diffusion of water in HD patients, with DTI parameters reflecting underlying microstructural changes of brain tissue. Since DTI has some limitations in characterizing tissue microstructure, some of which may be complicated by HD, we explored the use of the mean apparent propagator (MAP) model to describe diffusion in HD patients. We collected anatomical T1 and T2 FLAIR MRIs as well as multi-shell dMRI in ten HD participants and ten age-matched controls. The T1 and T2 FLAIR MRIs were used for tissue segmentation and identification of white matter hyperintensity, respectively. Multi-shell dMRI data were used to estimate MAP and DTI diffusion models. Each model was then used to characterize the differences between the HD cohort and the age-matched controls in normal appearing white matter, subcortical gray matter, corpus callosum (CC) and bilateral radiata (Rad). As expected, parameters of both DTI and MAP models of dMRI were significantly different in HD participants compared to controls. However, some MAP parameters suggested additional tissue microstructural changes in HD participants, such as increased axonal diameter. Measurements of non-Gaussianity indicated that MAP provided better a diffusion estimate than DTI, and MAP appeared to provide a more accurate measure of anisotropy in Rad, based on measures of the Rad/CC ratio. In conclusion, parameters of the MAP and DTI models were both sensitive to changes in diffusivity in HD participants compared to controls; however, the MAP model appeared to provide additional detailed information about changes in brain tissue microstructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.