Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37150269›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2023

Characterization of diffusion MRI using the mean apparent propagator model in hemodialysis patients: A pilot study.

Wesley T Richerson, L Tugan Muftuler, Dawn F Wolfgram, Brian D Schmit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wesley T RichersonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America. Electronic address: wesley.richerson@vumc.org.
L Tugan MuftulerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.
Dawn F WolfgramDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin and Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.
Brian D SchmitDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.

Funding

Intra-dialytic cerebral oximetry and cognitive decline in adults on hemodialysisK23DK113119 · NIDDK · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI WOLFGRAM, DAWN F. · 2018 to 2022
$883k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK113119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To better understand documented cognitive decline in hemodialysis (HD) patients, diffusion MRI (dMRI) has been used to characterize brain anatomical deficits relative to controls. Studies to this point have primarily used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to model the three-dimensional diffusion of water in HD patients, with DTI parameters reflecting underlying microstructural changes of brain tissue. Since DTI has some limitations in characterizing tissue microstructure, some of which may be complicated by HD, we explored the use of the mean apparent propagator (MAP) model to describe diffusion in HD patients. We collected anatomical T1 and T2 FLAIR MRIs as well as multi-shell dMRI in ten HD participants and ten age-matched controls. The T1 and T2 FLAIR MRIs were used for tissue segmentation and identification of white matter hyperintensity, respectively. Multi-shell dMRI data were used to estimate MAP and DTI diffusion models. Each model was then used to characterize the differences between the HD cohort and the age-matched controls in normal appearing white matter, subcortical gray matter, corpus callosum (CC) and bilateral radiata (Rad). As expected, parameters of both DTI and MAP models of dMRI were significantly different in HD participants compared to controls. However, some MAP parameters suggested additional tissue microstructural changes in HD participants, such as increased axonal diameter. Measurements of non-Gaussianity indicated that MAP provided better a diffusion estimate than DTI, and MAP appeared to provide a more accurate measure of anisotropy in Rad, based on measures of the Rad/CC ratio. In conclusion, parameters of the MAP and DTI models were both sensitive to changes in diffusivity in HD participants compared to controls; however, the MAP model appeared to provide additional detailed information about changes in brain tissue microstructure.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingWhite MatterBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPilot ProjectsDiffusion MRIDiffusion tensor imagingEnd-stage renal diseaseHemodialysisMean apparent propagator

Identifiers

PMID37150269
PMCPMC10524280

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.