ArticleClinical transplantation2023
Unsupervised mRNA-seq classification of heart transplant endomyocardial biopsies.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural language processing of biomedical text to map and prioritize protein-disease associations in HFpEF.Computers in biology and medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Echocardiographic Trajectories of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is currently considered the gold standard for diagnosing cardiac allograft rejection. However, significant limitations related to histological interpretation variability are well-recognized. We sought to develop a methodology to evaluate EMB solely based on gene expression, without relying on histology interpretation.
methodsSixty-four EMBs were obtained from 47 post-heart transplant recipients, who were evaluated for allograft rejection. EMBs were subjected to mRNA sequencing, in which an unsupervised classification algorithm was used to identify the molecular signatures that best classified the EMBs. Cytokine and natriuretic peptide peripheral blood profiling was also performed. Subsequently, we performed gene network analysis to identify the gene modules and gene ontology to understand their biological relevance. We correlated our findings with the unsupervised and histological classifications.
resultsOur algorithm classifies EMBs into three categories based solely on clusters of gene expression: unsupervised classes 1, 2, and 3. Unsupervised and histological classifications were closely related, with stronger gene module-phenotype correlations for the unsupervised classes. Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed processes impacting on the regulation of cardiac and mitochondrial function, immune response, and tissue injury response. Significant levels of cytokines and natriuretic peptides were detected following the unsupervised classification.
conclusionWe have developed an unsupervised algorithm that classifies EMBs into three distinct categories, without relying on histology interpretation. These categories were highly correlated with mitochondrial, immune, and tissue injury response. Significant cytokine and natriuretic peptide levels were detected within the unsupervised classification. If further validated, the unsupervised classification could offer a more objective EMB evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.