Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37151418›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2023

Practical implementation and clinical benefits of the new automated dialysate sodium control biosensor.

Francisco Maduell, José J Broseta, Diana Rodríguez-Espinosa, Joaquim Casals, Victor Escudero, Miquel Gomez, Lida M Rodas, Marta Arias-Guillén, Manel Vera, Néstor Fontseré

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francisco MaduellDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1673-0353
José J BrosetaDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Diana Rodríguez-EspinosaDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1027-7156
Joaquim CasalsDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Victor EscuderoDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Miquel GomezDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Lida M RodasDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta Arias-GuillénDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Manel VeraDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9937-7235
Néstor FontseréDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A key feature of dialysis treatment is the prescription of dialysate sodium (Na). This study aimed to describe the practical implementation of a new automated dialysate Na control biosensor and to assess its tolerance and the beneficial clinical effects of isonatraemic dialysis. Methods: A prospective study was carried out in 86 patients who, along with their usual parameters, received the following five consecutive phases of treatment for 3 weeks each: phase 0: baseline 5008 machine; phases 1 and 2: 6008 machine without activation of the Na control biosensor and the same fixed individualized Na dialysate prescription or adjusted to obtain similar conductivity to phase 0; phases 3 and 4: activated Na control to isonatraemic dialysis (Na dialysate margins 135-141 or 134-142 mmol/L). Results: When the Na control was activated, the few episodes of cramps or hypotension disappeared when the lower dialysate Na margin was increased by 1 or 2 mmol/L. The activated Na control module showed significant differences compared with baseline and the non-activated Na module in final serum Na values, diffusive Na balance, and changes in pre- to postdialysis plasma Na values. The mean predialysis systolic blood pressure value was significantly lower in phase 4 than in phase 1. There were no significant differences in total Na balance in the four 6008 phases evaluated. Conclusions: The implementation of the automated dialysate Na control module is a useful new tool, which reduced the diffusive load of Na with good tolerance. The module had the advantages of reducing thirst, interdialytic weight gain and intradialytic plasma Na changes.

Indexed as

cardiovascular riskdialysate sodiumdiffusive sodium loadhemodiafiltrationinterdialytic sodium changesintradialysis tolerance

Identifiers

PMID37151418
PMCPMC10157758
OpenAlexW4317911691

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.