Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37152207›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2023

Challenges and opportunities in rapid disaster research: lessons from the field in New Mexico and Vanuatu.

Mary Alice Scott, Kathryn M Olszowy, Kelsey N Dancause, Amanda Roome, Chim Chan, Hailey K Taylor, Andrea Marañon-Laguna, Emilee Montoya, Alysa Garcia, Claudia Mares and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mary Alice Scott *Department of Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.
Kathryn M Olszowy *Department of Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.
Kelsey N DancauseDépartement des sciences de l'activité physique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Amanda RoomeDepartment of Anthropology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, United States.
Chim ChanDepartment of Parasitology and Virology, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Hailey K TaylorDepartment of Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.
Andrea Marañon-LagunaDepartment of Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.
Emilee MontoyaDepartment of Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.
Alysa GarciaDepartment of Anthropology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.
Claudia MaresDepartment of Health and Human Services, Las Cruces, NM, United States.
Beverlyn TosiroMinistry of Health, Port Vila, Vanuatu.
Len TarivondaMinistry of Health, Port Vila, Vanuatu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid research is essential to assess impacts in communities affected by disasters, particularly those communities made "hard-to-reach" due to their active marginalization across history and in contemporary practices. In this article, we describe two rapid research projects developed to assess needs for and experiences of communities hard-hit by disasters. The first is a project on the COVID-19 pandemic in southern New Mexico (USA) that was developed to provide information to local agencies that are deploying programs to rebuild and revitalize marginalized communities. The second is a project on population displacement due to a volcanic eruption in Vanuatu, a lower-middle income country in the South Pacific, with mental and physical health outcomes data shared with the Vanuatu Ministry of Health. We describe the similar and unique challenges that arose doing rapid research in these two different contexts, the potential broader impacts of the research, and a synthesis of lessons learned. We discuss the challenges of rapidly changing rules and regulations, lack of baseline data, lack of survey instruments validated for specific populations and in local languages, limited availability of community partners, finding funding for rapid deployment of projects, rapidly training and working with research assistants, health and safety concerns of researchers and participants, and communicating with local and international partners. We also specifically discuss how we addressed our own personal challenges while also conducting time-intensive rapid research. In both studies, researchers shared results with governmental and non-governmental partners who may use the data to inform the design of their own relief programs. While different in context, type of disaster, and research strategy, our discussion of these projects provides insights into common lessons learned for working with communities at elevated risk for the worst outcomes during disasters, such as the need for flexibility, compromise, and good working relationships with community partners.

Indexed as

COVID-19natural disastersrapid ethnographic assessmentrapid researchU.S.-Mexico border regionVanuatu

Identifiers

PMID37152207
PMCPMC10157172

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.