Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37157001›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2023

Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies.

Ke Bin Xiao, Erin Grennell, Anthony Ngoy, Tony P George, Bernard Le Foll, Christian S Hendershot, Matthew E Sloan

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cannabis use disorder: from neurobiology to treatment.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  5. Human laboratory models of reward in substance use disorder.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ke Bin XiaoAddictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Erin GrennellDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anthony NgoyAddictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tony P GeorgeAddictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bernard Le FollAddictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christian S HendershotDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Matthew E SloanAddictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. matthew.sloan@camh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2172-8802
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis self-administration studies may be helpful for identifying factors that influence cannabis consumption and subjective response to cannabis. Additionally, these paradigms could be useful for testing novel pharmacotherapies for cannabis use disorder. This scoping review aims to summarize the findings from existing ad libitum cannabis self-administration studies to determine what has been learned from these studies as well as their limitations. We examined studies that specifically examined cannabis smoking, focusing on subjective response and self-administration behavior (e.g., smoking topography). A systematic search was conducted using PubMed and Embase from inception to October 22, 2022. Our search strategy identified 26 studies (total N = 662, 79% male) that met our eligibility criteria. We found that tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration significantly affected subjective response to cannabis in some but not all studies. In general, cannabis self-administration tended to be most intense at the beginning of the laboratory session and decreased in later parts of the session. There was limited data on cannabis self-administration in adults older than 55. Data on external validity and test-retest reliability were also limited. Addressing these limitations in future ad libitum cannabis self-administration studies could lead to more valid and generalizable paradigms, which in turn could be used to improve our understanding of cannabis use patterns and to help guide medication development for cannabis use disorder.

Indexed as

CannabisHallucinogensMarijuana AbuseMarijuana SmokingCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDronabinolFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDronabinolHallucinogensAd libitumCannabisCannabis smokingFree-accessHuman laboratorySelf-administrationSubjective response

Identifiers

PMID37157001
PMCPMC10272254
OpenAlexW4375954863

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.