Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37159281›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2023

T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination differ by disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis.

Asia-Sophia Wolf, Anthony Ravussin, Marton König, Mathias H Øverås, Guri Solum, Ingrid Fadum Kjønstad, Adity Chopra, Trygve Holmøy, Hanne F Harbo, Silje Watterdal Syversen and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Robust spike-specific CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Asia-Sophia WolfDivision of Infection Control, Section for Immunology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Anthony RavussinDivision of Infection Control, Section for Immunology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Marton KönigDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mathias H ØveråsDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Guri SolumDivision of Infection Control, Section for Immunology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid Fadum KjønstadDivision of Infection Control, Section for Immunology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Adity ChopraInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Trygve HolmøyInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Hanne F HarboDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Silje Watterdal SyversenCenter for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kristin Kaasen JørgensenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Einar August HøgestølDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jon Torgils VaageInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Elisabeth G CeliusDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Fridtjof Lund-JohansenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ludvig A MuntheInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Gro Owren NygaardDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Siri MjaalandDivision of Infection Control, Section for Immunology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOAkershus University Hospital · NODiakonhjemmet Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune responses in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been of significant interest throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Lymphocyte-targeting immunotherapies, including anti-CD20 treatments and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators, attenuate Ab responses after vaccination. Evaluation of cellular responses after vaccination, therefore, is of particular importance in these populations. In this study, we used flow cytometry to analyze CD4 and CD8 T cell functional responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides in healthy control study participants and pwMS receiving 5 different DMTs. Although pwMS receiving rituximab and fingolimod therapies had low Ab responses after both 2 and 3 vaccine doses, T cell responses in pwMS taking rituximab were preserved after a third vaccination, even when an additional dose of rituximab was administered between vaccine doses 2 and 3. PwMS taking fingolimod had low detectable T cell responses in peripheral blood. CD4 and CD8 T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern Delta and Omicron were lower than to the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 variant. Our results indicate the importance of assessing both cellular and humoral responses after vaccination and suggest that, even in the absence of robust Ab responses, vaccination can generate immune responses in pwMS.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiple SclerosisCOVID-19 VaccinesFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansPandemicsRituximabSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesFingolimod HydrochlorideRituximabCellular immune responseCOVID-19ImmunologyMultiple sclerosisT cells

Identifiers

PMID37159281
PMCPMC10371236
OpenAlexW4375955005

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.