ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Systematic analysis of transcriptome signature for improving outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review on trends in development and translation of omics signatures in cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Deep contrastive learning for predicting cancer prognosis using gene expression values.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe updated guidelines highlight gene expression-based multigene panel as a critical tool to assess overall survival (OS) and improve treatment for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients. Nevertheless, genome-wide expression signatures are still limited in real clinical utility because of insufficient data utilization, a lack of critical validation, and inapposite machine learning algorithms.
methods2330 primary LUAD samples were enrolled from 11 independent cohorts. Seventy-six algorithm combinations based on ten machine learning algorithms were applied. A total of 108 published gene expression signatures were collected. Multiple pharmacogenomics databases and resources were utilized to identify precision therapeutic drugs.
resultsWe comprehensively developed a robust machine learning-derived genome-wide expression signature (RGS) according to stably OS-associated RNAs (OSRs). RGS was an independent risk element and remained robust and reproducible power by comparing it with general clinical parameters, molecular characteristics, and 108 published signatures. RGS-based stratification possessed different biological behaviors, molecular mechanisms, and immune microenvironment patterns. Integrating multiple databases and previous studies, we identified that alisertib was sensitive to the high-risk group, and RITA was sensitive to the low-risk group.
conclusionOur study offers an appealing platform to screen dismal prognosis LUAD patients to improve clinical outcomes by optimizing precision therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.