ArticleCancer medicine2023
The effect of propofol on chemosensitivity of paclitaxel in cervical cancer cells.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of anesthetics on development of gynecological cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- The effect of propofol on chemosensitivity of paclitaxel in cervical cancer cells.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPropofol is a drug with potential anticancer effect. This study aimed to explore the effect of propofol on chemosensitivity of cervical cancer cells to paclitaxel.
methodsHeLa and CaSki cells were selected for drug experiments. Cell viability was evaluated via CCK-8 assay, and the combination index (CI) was calculated by CompuSyn software. A clinically relevant concentration and IC30 of propofol were selected in combination with 5 nM paclitaxel. BrdU incorporation, transwell, and flow cytometry assays were utilized to evaluate cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis. The expression of β-tubulin, stathmin 1, and GAPDH proteins was evaluated by Western blot. The stathmin 1 cDNA plasmid was used to establish stathmin 1-overexpressing CaSki cells.
resultsAt clinically relevant concentrations (0-80 μM), propofol did not affect cancer cell viability, but high concentrations (100-800 μM) reduced cell viability. The CI values of propofol with IC30 (200 μM in HeLa; 400 μM in CaSki) combined with 5 nM paclitaxel were <1. The effect of propofol with IC30 combined with paclitaxel on cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis were stronger than individual effect, while 30 μM propofol had no effect. The Western blot results showed 30 μM propofol did not affect β-tubulin and stathmin 1 expression in cells, although paclitaxel upregulated β-tubulin expression while downregulating stathmin 1 expression. Compared with paclitaxel alone, cotreatment with propofol at its IC30 and paclitaxel decreased stathmin 1 expression but had no effect on β-tubulin expression. High stathmin 1 expression weakened the effect of paclitaxel on cell viability and apoptosis, while propofol partially reversed these effect.
conclusionPropofol at clinically relevant concentrations had no effect on the malignant biological behaviors of cervical cancer cells, while propofol at high concentrations decreased.Propofol with IC30 and paclitaxel had synergetic effect on cancer cells through a reduction in stathmin 1 expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.