Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37166557›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2023

Copy number aberrations in circulating tumor DNA enables prognosis prediction and molecular characterization of breast cancer.

Min Hwan Kim, Gun Min Kim, Jin Mo Ahn, Won-Ji Ryu, Seul-Gi Kim, Jee Hung Kim, Tae Yeong Kim, Hyun Ju Han, Jee Ye Kim, Hyung Seok Park and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02441933 (A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase III Trial Comparing Anthracyclines Followed by Taxane Versus Anthracyclines Followed by Taxane Plus Carboplatin as), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02441933 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase III Trial Comparing Anthracyclines Followed by Taxane Versus Anthracyclines Followed by Taxane Plus Carboplatin as (Neo) Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Triple-negative Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2015 to 2025Enrolled878ConditionsBreast CancerArmstaxane plus carboplatin, Taxane
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Min Hwan KimDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gun Min KimDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Mo AhnGreen Cross Genome, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Won-Ji RyuAvison Biomedical Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seul-Gi KimDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jee Hung KimDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae Yeong KimAvison Biomedical Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Ju HanAvison Biomedical Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jee Ye KimDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyung Seok ParkDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seho ParkDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byeong Woo ParkDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Il KimDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joon JeongDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jieun LeeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soonmyung PaikSeverance Biomedical Science Institute and Department of Medical Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sangwoo KimDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5356-0827
Kyung Hae JungDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun Hae ChoGreen Cross Genome, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Joohyuk SohnDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2303-2764
Yonsei University · KRGreen Cross (South Korea) · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRUlsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-pass whole-genome sequencing (LP-WGS)-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is a versatile tool for somatic copy number aberration (CNA) detection, and this study aims to explore its clinical implication in breast cancer.

methodsWe analyzed LP-WGS ctDNA data from 207 metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients to explore prognostic value of ctDNA CNA burden and validated it in 465 stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in phase III PEARLY trial (NCT02441933). The clinical implication of locus level LP-WGS ctDNA profiling was further evaluated.

resultsWe found that a high baseline ctDNA CNA burden predicts poor overall survival and progression-free survival of MBC patients. The post hoc analysis of the PEARLY trial showed that a high baseline ctDNA CNA burden predicted poor disease-free survival independent from pathologic complete response (pCR), validating its robust prognostic significance. The 24-month disease-free survival rate was 96.9% and 55.9% in [pCR(+) and low I-score] and [non-pCR and high I-score] patients, respectively. The locus-level ctDNA CNA profile classified MBC patients into 5 molecular clusters and revealed targetable oncogenic CNAs. LP-WGS ctDNA and in vitro analysis identified the BCL6 amplification as a resistance factor for CDK4/6 inhibitors. We estimated ctDNA-based homologous recombination deficiency status of patients by shallowHRD algorithm, which was highest in the TNBC and correlated with platinum-based chemotherapy response.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate LP-WGS ctDNA CNA analysis as an essential tool for prognosis prediction and molecular profiling. Particularly, ctDNA CNA burden can serve as a useful determinant for escalating or de-escalating (neo)adjuvant strategy in TNBC patients.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNATriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Copy Number VariationsHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID37166557
PMCPMC10483335
OpenAlexW4376133526

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.