ArticleCureus2023
Open Latarjet Versus Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for the Treatment of Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability in High-Demand Patients With Minimal Glenoid Bone Loss.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Outcomes for Anterior Shoulder Instability.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Pooled it
- Internal rotation strength recovers fully after the open Latarjet via a subscapularis-split: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- A Comparison of Return to Sport After Bankart Repair Versus Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Review
- The Latarjet Procedure in Patients With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss: Long-Term Results and Its Association With Graft Resorption.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study compared the clinical outcomes and return to sports/work between open Latarjet and arthroscopic Bankart repair in high-demand patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability with minimal glenoid bone loss.
methodsWe prospectively recruited 30 patients and randomised them to either open Latarjet or arthroscopic Bankart. The mean duration of follow-up in our study was 13.27 months±2.70. All patients were males with a mean age at surgery of 28.6 years (range, 18-41 years).
resultsThe overall mean for the Rowe score in the 30 patients increased from 33.5±14 points preoperatively to 79.6±18 points. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative ROM (range of motion) and Rowe score among the Bankart and Latarjet groups. The main finding in our study was the time to return to sports/work which was significantly lower in the Latarjet group (5.2 months) compared to the Bankart group (seven months).
conclusionsOpen Latarjet is considered a more invasive and non-anatomical procedure, however, it is less costly with a shorter time to return to sports/work compared to the Bankart procedure, which is very crucial for high-demand patients, especially the competitive athletes targeting an early return to sports at the same pre-injury level with minimal incidence of recurrence, making the surgeon's choice very challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.