Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37168493›Full record

ReviewFunction (Oxford, England)2023

Precision Medicine in Pancreatitis: The Future of Acute Pancreatitis Care.

Andras Garami, Peter Hegyi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Function (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andras GaramiDepartment of Thermophysiology, Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs H7624, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2493-0571
Peter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs H7624, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0399-7259
Semmelweis University · HUUniversity of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis (AP) continues to present a substantial burden to patients and healthcare personnel. Despite its occasionally severe progression and high mortality rate, there is no specific therapy that could be routinely applied in patients with AP. Here, we review treatment possibilities in AP, describe how the treatment approaches have changed in pancreatic cancer as an analogy, and point out potential causes for the failure of clinical trials on AP. We highlight that instead of attempting to discover generalized treatment options that could be used in any AP patient, it is time for a paradigm shift in the treatment of AP, which would help to focus more on individual patients or specific patient subpopulations when designing clinical trials and therapeutic approaches (similarly as in pancreatic cancer). Since the recruitment of specific patient subpopulations with AP could take excessive time if clinical centers work separately, the development of precision medicine in AP would require to establish an expert committee, eg, Pancreatitis Precision Medicine Interest Group, which could organize and coordinate the activities of the joined centers. With the joined forces of expert clinicians and leading centers, a new era could start in the treatment of AP, in which personalized treatment options could be discovered and introduced to efficiently reduce the burden of the disease on patients and healthcare workers.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsPancreatitisAcute DiseaseHumansPrecision Medicinebiomarkerindividualized therapyinflammationpancreaspancreatic cancerpersonalized treatmenttargeted therapytranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID37168493
PMCPMC10165548
OpenAlexW4362602817

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.