Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37169792›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Sputum handling for rheology.

Lydia Esteban Enjuto, Matthieu Robert de Saint Vincent, Max Maurin, Bruno Degano, Hugues Bodiguel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. EngineeringJournal of materials chemistry. B · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lydia Esteban EnjutoUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, LRP UMR5520, Grenoble, France. estebanl@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.
Matthieu Robert de Saint VincentUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, LRP UMR5520, Grenoble, France.
Max MaurinUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CHU Grenoble Alpes, TIMC, Grenoble, France.
Bruno DeganoUniv. Grenoble Alpes, INSERM U1030, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Hugues BodiguelUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, LRP UMR5520, Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rheology of sputum is viewed as a powerful emerging biophysical marker for monitoring muco-obstructive pulmonary diseases such as cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF bronchiectasis (NCFB). However, there is no unified practice to process sputa from collection to analysis, which can lead to highly variable, and sometimes inconsistent results. The main objective of this study is to bring light into the handling of sputum samples to establish a standardised and robust protocol before rheological measurements. Sputum collected from 22 CF and 10 NCFB adults, was divided into control (vortexed and fresh: non-heated and non-frozen) and three treated conditions (either non-vortexed, heated or frozen). In addition, 6 CF expectorations were used to study the dynamics of ageing over 24 h. Sputum's mechanical properties were measured with a rotational rheometer to obtain their properties at rest, elastic ([Formula: see text]) and viscous moduli ([Formula: see text]), and at the onset of flow, critical deformation ([Formula: see text]) and critical stress ([Formula: see text]). We demonstrate that heating sputum is completely destructive while freezing sputa at [Formula: see text] has no discernible effect on their rheology. We also show that the variability of rheological measurements largely resulted from the sample's macroscopic heterogeneity, and can be greatly reduced by non-destructive vortex homogenisation. Finally, we observed contrasted ageing effects as a fonction of purulence: while the viscoelasticity of purulent samples reduced by half within 6 h after collection, semi-purulent samples did not evolve. These results guide towards a robust unified protocol for simple sputum handling in rheometry. We therefore suggest to vortex and snap freeze sputum samples immediately after collection when direct testing is not possible.

Indexed as

BronchiectasisCystic FibrosisLung Diseases, ObstructiveAdultHumansRheologySputum

Identifiers

PMID37169792
PMCPMC10173912

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.