Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37170640›Full record

SynthesisJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2024

Measuring Quantitative Cerebral Blood Flow in Healthy Children: A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging Techniques.

Moss Y Zhao, Elizabeth Tong, Rui Duarte Armindo, Amanda Woodward, Kristen W Yeom, Michael E Moseley, Greg Zaharchuk

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Moss Y ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0210-7739
Elizabeth TongDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9550-8178
Rui Duarte ArmindoDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0001-742X
Amanda WoodwardLane Medical Library, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8815-1369
Kristen W YeomDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Michael E MoseleyDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9163-8741
Greg ZaharchukDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5781-8848
Stanford University · USHospital Beatriz Ângelo · PT

Funding

Cerebrovascular Reserve Imaging with Simultaneous PET/MRI Using Arterial Spin Labeling and Deep LearningR01EB025220 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZAHARCHUK, GREGORY GEORGE · 2018 to 2021
$2.8M
Investigating the pathogenesis of Moyamoya Disease using patient derived induced pluripotent stem cellsR21NS121589 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEINBERG, GARY K · 2021 to 2022
$433k
NIBIB NIH HHSNIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025220NIH HHS R01EB025220-02NIH HHS R21NS121589NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS121589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is an important hemodynamic parameter to evaluate brain health. It can be obtained quantitatively using medical imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography (PET). Although CBF in adults has been widely studied and linked with cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, CBF data in healthy children are sparse due to the challenges in pediatric neuroimaging. An understanding of the factors affecting pediatric CBF and its normal range is crucial to determine the optimal CBF measuring techniques in pediatric neuroradiology. This review focuses on pediatric CBF studies using neuroimaging techniques in 32 articles including 2668 normal subjects ranging from birth to 18 years old. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus and reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). We identified factors (such as age, gender, mood, sedation, and fitness) that have significant effects on pediatric CBF quantification. We also investigated factors influencing the CBF measurements in infants. Based on this review, we recommend best practices to improve CBF measurements in pediatric neuroimaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingAdultBrainCerebrovascular CirculationChildHumansInfantPositron-Emission TomographySpin LabelsSpin Labelsarterial spin labelingcerebral blood flowchildrenpediatricphase contrastsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37170640
PMCPMC10638464
OpenAlexW4376226130

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.