Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37171784›Full record

ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2023

Application of machine learning algorithms to predict osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

X Wu, F Zhai, A Chang, J Wei, Y Guo, J Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

X WuDepartment of Endocrinology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, 16 Xinhua West Road, Cangzhou, 061000, Hebei, People's Republic of China. wxl20112285@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9850-0094
F ZhaiGynecological Clinic, Cangzhou Central Hospital, 16 Xinhua West Road, Cangzhou, 061000, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
A ChangDepartment of Endocrinology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, 16 Xinhua West Road, Cangzhou, 061000, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
J WeiDepartment of Endocrinology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, 16 Xinhua West Road, Cangzhou, 061000, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
Y GuoDepartment of Endocrinology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, 16 Xinhua West Road, Cangzhou, 061000, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
J ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, 16 Xinhua West Road, Cangzhou, 061000, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
Cangzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

Hebei Province Medical Science Research Key Project 20211155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe screening and diagnosis of osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) based on bone mineral density remains challenging because of the limited availability and accessibility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. We aimed to develop and validate models to predict the risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with T2DM based on machine learning (ML) algorithms.

methodsThis retrospective study included 303 postmenopausal women with T2DM. To develop prediction models for osteoporosis, we applied nine ML algorithms combined with demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used to perform feature selection. We used the bootstrap resampling technique for model training and validation. To test the performance of the models, we calculated indices including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, F1 score, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. Furthermore, we conducted fivefold cross-validation for parameter optimization and model validation. Feature importance was assessed using the SHapley additive explanation (SHAP).

resultsWe identified 10 independent predictors as the most valuable features. An AUROC of 0.616-1.000 was observed for nine ML algorithms. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model exhibited the best performance, outperforming conventional risk assessment tools and registering 0.993 in the training set, 0.798 in the validation set, and 0.786 in the test set for fivefold cross-validation. Using SHAP, we found that the explanatory variables contributed to the model and their relationship with osteoporosis occurrence. Furthermore, we developed a user-friendly tool for calculating the risk of osteoporosis.

conclusionsWith the integration of demographic and clinical risk factors, ML algorithms can accurately predict osteoporosis. The XGBoost model showed ideal performance. With the incorporation of these models in the clinic, patients may benefit from early osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2OsteoporosisAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningPostmenopauseRetrospective StudiesMachine learningOsteoporosisPrediction modelType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID37171784
OpenAlexW4376225575

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.