Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37179521›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2023

Should routine surgical wound drainage after ventral hernia repair be avoided? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

A Y Y Mohamedahmed, S Zaman, N Ghassemi, A Ghassemi, A A Wuheb, H E E Abdalla, S Hajibandeh, S Hajibandeh

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comment to: Should routine surgical wound drainage after ventral hernia repair be avoided.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Comment to: should routine surgical wound drainage after ventral hernia repair be avoided?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A Y Y Mohamedahmed *Department of General Surgery, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, UK. dr.aliyasen1@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1219-7571
S Zaman *Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West, Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
N GhassemiDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-On-Trent, UK.
A GhassemiSchool of Medicine and Surgery, Gemelli University Hospital, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
A A WuhebDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, UK.
H E E AbdallaDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, UK.
S HajibandehDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff & Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK.
S HajibandehDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-On-Trent, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate outcomes of drain use vs. no-drain use during ventral hernia repair.

methodsA PRISMA-compliant systematic review was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane database, The Virtual Health Library, Clinical trials.gov and Science Direct. Studies comparing use of drains with no-drain during ventral hernia repair (primary or incisional) were included. Wound-related complications, operative time, need for mesh removal and early recurrence were the evaluated outcome parameters.

resultsEight studies reporting a total number of two thousand four hundred and sixty-eight patients (drain group = 1214; no-drain group = 1254) were included. The drain group had a significantly higher rate of surgical site infections (SSI) and longer operative time compared with the no-drain group [odds ratio (OR): 1.63, P = 0.01] and [mean difference (MD): 57.30, P = 0.007], respectively. Overall wound-related complications [OR: 0.95, P = 0.88], seroma formation [OR: 0.66, P = 0.24], haematoma occurrence [OR: 0.78, P = 0.61], mesh removal [OR: 1.32, P = 0.74] and early hernia recurrence [OR: 1.10, P = 0.94] did not differ significantly between the two groups.

conclusionThe available evidence does not seem to support the routine use of surgical drains during primary or incisional ventral hernia repairs. They are associated with increased rates of SSIs and longer total operative time with no significant advantage in terms of wound-related complications.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralIncisional HerniaSurgical WoundDrainageHerniorrhaphyHumansRecurrenceSurgical MeshSurgical Wound InfectionIncisional herniaSurgical drainVentral hernia

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.