Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37180101›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Biological treatment for bullous pemphigoid.

Meital Oren-Shabtai, Daniel Mimouni, Adi Nosrati, Lihi Atzmony, Baruch Kaplan, Aviv Barzilai, Sharon Baum

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Meital Oren-ShabtaiDivision of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Daniel MimouniDivision of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Adi NosratiDivision of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Lihi AtzmonyDivision of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Baruch KaplanAdelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Aviv BarzilaiSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sharon BaumSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILAriel University · ILRabin Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal bullous disease. Topical or systemic corticosteroids are often used as the first-line treatment. However, long-term corticosteroid use may lead to significant side effects. Therefore, various adjuvant immunosuppressant therapies are used as steroid-sparing agents, with accumulating reports of biological treatments for severely recalcitrant BP. Objective: To describe the clinical and immunological features of a series of patients with recalcitrant BP treated with immunobiological therapies. To assess the efficacy and safety of their therapies. Methods: Patients receiving biological treatment for BP from two centers were assessed. Here, we described the clinical, immunopathological, and immunofluorescence findings of adult patients with BP and analyzed the clinical response and adverse events associated with various biological therapies. Results: We identified nine eligible patients treated with rituximab (seven), omalizumab (three), or dupilumab (one). The mean age at diagnosis was 60.4 years, the average BP duration before biologic initiation was 1.9 years, and the average previous treatment failure was 2.11 therapies. The mean follow-up period from the first biological treatment to the last visit was 29.3 months. Satisfactory response, defined as clinical improvement, was achieved in 78% (7) of the patients, and total BP clearance was achieved in 55% (5) of the patients at the last follow-up visit. Additional rituximab courses improved the disease outcomes. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Efficient and safe novel therapies can be considered in recalcitrant steroid-dependent BP non-responsive to conventional immunosuppressant therapies.

Indexed as

Pemphigoid, BullousSkin Diseases, VesiculobullousAdultHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsOmalizumabRituximabImmunosuppressive AgentsOmalizumabRituximabautoimmune subepidermal bullous diseasebullous pemphigoidcorticosteroidsdupilumabomalizumabrituximabsteroid-sparing immunomodulatory agents

Identifiers

PMID37180101
PMCPMC10172582
OpenAlexW4367321292

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.