ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
Biological treatment for bullous pemphigoid.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dupilumab treatment outcomes in bullous pemphigoid: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of the role of interleukin-17 inhibitors in bullous pemphigoid: therapeutic and paradoxical effects.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Pooled it
- Successful management of DPP-4 inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid with Stapokibart injection in an elderly diabetic patient: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A 10-Year Observational Study on Treatment Approaches in Pemphigus and Pemphigoid.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2025Review
- Bullous Pemphigoid and Epidemiological Patterns in Northern Greece: Insights from an 8-Year Observational Study.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Article
- A case of pembrolizumab-induced bullous pemphigoid treated with dupilumab.Skin health and disease · 2025Article
- From Pruritus to Bullae: Recognizing Furosemide-Induced Bullous Pemphigoid in an Elderly Male Patient.Cureus · 2025Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Cutaneous Adverse Events: Mechanisms of Occurrence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Pregabalin-Induced Bullous Pemphigoid: A Case Report of a Rare Drug-Triggered Autoimmune Skin Disorder.Cureus · 2024Article
- Omalizumab and Dupilumab for the Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- When the Blisters Reach the Heart: An Uncommon Case of Cardiac Involvement in Bullous Pemphigoid.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal bullous disease. Topical or systemic corticosteroids are often used as the first-line treatment. However, long-term corticosteroid use may lead to significant side effects. Therefore, various adjuvant immunosuppressant therapies are used as steroid-sparing agents, with accumulating reports of biological treatments for severely recalcitrant BP. Objective: To describe the clinical and immunological features of a series of patients with recalcitrant BP treated with immunobiological therapies. To assess the efficacy and safety of their therapies. Methods: Patients receiving biological treatment for BP from two centers were assessed. Here, we described the clinical, immunopathological, and immunofluorescence findings of adult patients with BP and analyzed the clinical response and adverse events associated with various biological therapies. Results: We identified nine eligible patients treated with rituximab (seven), omalizumab (three), or dupilumab (one). The mean age at diagnosis was 60.4 years, the average BP duration before biologic initiation was 1.9 years, and the average previous treatment failure was 2.11 therapies. The mean follow-up period from the first biological treatment to the last visit was 29.3 months. Satisfactory response, defined as clinical improvement, was achieved in 78% (7) of the patients, and total BP clearance was achieved in 55% (5) of the patients at the last follow-up visit. Additional rituximab courses improved the disease outcomes. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Efficient and safe novel therapies can be considered in recalcitrant steroid-dependent BP non-responsive to conventional immunosuppressant therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.