ArticleTranslational cancer research2023
Identification and experimental verification of an anoikis and immune related signature in prognosis for lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the prognostic and immunotherapeutic role of Tregs in lung cancer using integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Both metastasis and immune resistance are huge obstacle in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) treatment. Multiple studies have shown that the ability of tumor cells to resist anoikis is closely related to the metastasis of tumor cells. Methods: In this study, the risk prognosis signature related to anoikis and immune related genes (AIRGs) was constructed by cluster analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression by using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Program and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curve described the prognosis in the different groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was applied to evaluate the sensitivity of this signature. Principal component analysis (PCA), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), independent prognostic analysis, and nomogram were utilized to assess the validity of the signature. In addition, we used multiple bioinformatic tools to analyze the function between different groups. Finally, mRNA levels were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Results: The K-M curve showed a worse prognosis for the high-risk group compared to that for the low-risk group. ROC, PCA, t-SNE, independent prognostic analysis and nomogram showed well predictive capabilities. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis revealed that differential genes were mainly enriched in immunity, metabolism, and cell cycle. In addition, multiple immune cells and targeted drugs differed in the two risk groups. Finally, we found that the mRNA levels of AIRGs were remarkably different in normal versus cancer cells. Conclusions: In short, we established a new model about anoikis and immune, which can well predict prognosis and immune response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.