Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37184929›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Exploring Access as a Process of Adaptation in a Self-Monitoring Perinatal eHealth System: Mixed Methods Study From a Sociomaterial Perspective.

Jennifer Auxier, Kaisu T Savolainen, Miriam Bender, Amir M Rahmani, Fatemeh Sarhaddi, Iman Azimi, Anna M Axelin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer AuxierDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9504-2518
Kaisu T SavolainenDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7887-4662
Miriam BenderSue & Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2457-1652
Amir M RahmaniDonald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0725-1155
Fatemeh SarhaddiDepartment of Future Technologies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5750-5793
Iman AzimiDonald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5003-299X
Anna M AxelinDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2743-3589
University of Turku · FIUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development and quality assurance of perinatal eHealth self-monitoring systems is an upcoming area of inquiry in health science. Building patient engagement into eHealth development as a core component has potential to guide process evaluation. Access, 1 attribute of patient engagement, is the focus of study here. Access to eHealth self-monitoring programs has the potential to influence pregnancy health and wellness outcomes. Little is known about how pregnant users' ability to obtain resources is influenced by their own adaptive activities and the mediating activities of eHealth systems during the process of real-world testing of these systems.

objectiveHere, we examine the patient engagement process of access occurring during the adaptation of eHealth self-monitoring use from a sociomaterial perspective.

methodsIn this mixed methods convergent evaluation design, we interviewed women about perceptions of the adaptation process of using an eHealth self-monitoring system. Deductive analysis was conducted guided by the definition of access as an attribute of patient engagement. After initial qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis, participants were spilt based on their level of use of the eHealth system (physical wear time of self-monitoring device). Content analysis was then conducted according to user group, using a conceptual matrix developed from ontological perspectives of sociomateriality.

resultsPregnant users' adaptive activities and the mediation activities of the eHealth system represent a cocreation process that resulted in user group-specific characteristics of accessing and using the system. The high- and low-use groups experienced different personal adaptation and eHealth mediation during this process of cocreation. Differences were noted between high- and low-use groups, with the high-use group giving attention to developing skills in recording and interpreting data and the low-use group discussing the manual adding of activities to the system and how the system worked best for them when they used it in their mother tongue.

conclusionsA cocreation process between pregnant users and the eHealth system was identified, illustrating access as a useful core component of perinatal eHealth self-monitoring systems. Researchers and clinicians can observe reasons for why pregnant users access eHealth systems in unique ways based on their personal preferences, habits, and values. Mediation activities of the eHealth system and the different user adaptive activities represent a cocreation process between the users and the eHealth system that is necessary for the personalization of perinatal eHealth systems.

Indexed as

cocreationcodesigneHealthmaternalmotivationparticipatorypatient engagementpregnancypregnantself-monitorsociomaterialusageuse pattern

Identifiers

PMID37184929
PMCPMC10227706
OpenAlexW4361764038

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.