Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37185528›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2023

Carbon Nanomaterials-Based Screen-Printed Electrodes for Sensing Applications.

Rafael Matias Silva, Alexsandra Dias da Silva, Jéssica Rocha Camargo, Bruna Santos de Castro, Laís Muniz Meireles, Patrícia Soares Silva, Bruno Campos Janegitz, Tiago Almeida Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rafael Matias SilvaDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.
Alexsandra Dias da SilvaDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.
Jéssica Rocha CamargoLaboratory of Sensors, Nanomedicine, and Nanostructured Materials, Federal University of São Carlos, Araras 13600-970, SP, Brazil.
Bruna Santos de CastroDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.
Laís Muniz MeirelesFederal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais, Timóteo 35180-008, MG, Brazil.
Patrícia Soares SilvaDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.
Bruno Campos JanegitzLaboratory of Sensors, Nanomedicine, and Nanostructured Materials, Federal University of São Carlos, Araras 13600-970, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9707-9795
Tiago Almeida SilvaDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7202-789X

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Financial code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-00083-21Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-03113-22National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 301796/2022-0São Paulo Research Foundation 2017/21097-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical sensors consisting of screen-printed electrodes (SPEs) are recurrent devices in the recent literature for applications in different fields of interest and contribute to the expanding electroanalytical chemistry field. This is due to inherent characteristics that can be better (or only) achieved with the use of SPEs, including miniaturization, cost reduction, lower sample consumption, compatibility with portable equipment, and disposability. SPEs are also quite versatile; they can be manufactured using different formulations of conductive inks and substrates, and are of varied designs. Naturally, the analytical performance of SPEs is directly affected by the quality of the material used for printing and modifying the electrodes. In this sense, the most varied carbon nanomaterials have been explored for the preparation and modification of SPEs, providing devices with an enhanced electrochemical response and greater sensitivity, in addition to functionalized surfaces that can immobilize biological agents for the manufacture of biosensors. Considering the relevance and timeliness of the topic, this review aimed to provide an overview of the current scenario of the use of carbonaceous nanomaterials in the context of making electrochemical SPE sensors, from which different approaches will be presented, exploring materials traditionally investigated in electrochemistry, such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, carbon black, and those more recently investigated for this (carbon quantum dots, graphitic carbon nitride, and biochar). Perspectives on the use and expansion of these devices are also considered.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesNanotubes, CarbonElectrochemical TechniquesElectrochemistryElectrodesNanotubes, Carbonbiocharcarbonaceous nanomaterialscarbon blackcarbon nanotubescarbon quantum dotsdisposable electrodeselectroanalysisgraphenegraphitic carbon nitridescreen-printing

Identifiers

PMID37185528
PMCPMC10136782

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.