Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37185649›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Efficiency and effectiveness of intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with stroke/TIA or myocardial infarction compared to usual monitoring: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. DiVa (Dijon vascular) study.

Yannick Béjot, Anne-Laure Soilly, Marc Bardou, Gauthier Duloquin, Thibaut Pommier, Gabriel Laurent, Yves Cottin, Lucie Vadot, Héloïse Adam, Mathieu Boulin and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04188457 (Medical-economic Evaluation Comparing Intensive Outpatient Monitoring of Neuro-cardiovascular Diseases by Nurses, Doctors and Hospital and Private-sector Pharmacists, Compared to Usual Monitoring.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04188457 completednot on this map

Medical-economic Evaluation Comparing Intensive Outpatient Monitoring of Neuro-cardiovascular Diseases by Nurses, Doctors and Hospital and Private-sector Pharmacists, Compared to Usual Monitoring.

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRan2020 to 2025Enrolled859ConditionsCerebrovascular Accidents, Myocardial InfarctionArmsUsual follow-up, Intensive follow-up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yannick BéjotNeurology, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France yannick.bejot@chu-dijon.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7848-7072
Anne-Laure SoillyDepartment of Clinical Research and Innovation, Clinical Research Unit-Methodological Support Network (USMR), University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Marc BardouGastroenterology, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Gauthier DuloquinNeurology, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5351-7869
Thibaut PommierCardiology, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Gabriel LaurentCardiology, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Yves CottinCardiology, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5176-5121
Lucie VadotPharmacy, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Héloïse AdamPharmacy, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Mathieu BoulinPharmacy, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Maurice GiroudNeurology, University Hospital Centre Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe ongoing ageing population is associated with an increase in the number of patients suffering a stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or myocardial infarction (MI). In these patients, implementing secondary prevention is a critical challenge and new strategies need to be developed to close the gap between clinical practice and evidence-based recommendations. We describe the protocol of a randomised clinical trial that aims to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of an intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients compared with standard care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DiVa study is a randomised, prospective, controlled, multicentre trial including patients >18 years old with a first or recurrent stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) or TIA, or a type I or II MI, managed in one of the participating hospitals of the study area, with a survival expectancy >12 months. Patients will be randomised with an allocation ratio of 1:1 in two parallel groups: one group assigned to a multidisciplinary, nurse-based and pharmacist-based 2-year follow-up in association with general practitioners, neurologists and cardiologists versus one group with usual follow-up. In each group for each disease (stroke/TIA or MI), 430 patients will be enrolled (total of 1720 patients) over 3 years. The primary outcome will be the incremental cost-utility ratio at 24 months between intensive and standard follow-up in a society perspective. Secondary outcomes will include the incremental cost-utility ratio at 6 and 12 months, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at 24 months, reduction at 6, 12 and 24 months of the rates of death, unscheduled rehospitalisation and iatrogenic complications, changes in quality of life, net budgetary impact at 5 years of the intensive follow-up on the national health insurance perspective and analysis of factors having positive or negative effects on the implementation of the project in the study area. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained and all patients receive information about the study and give their consent to participate before randomisation. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary analyses will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04188457. Registered on 6 December 2019.

Indexed as

Ischemic Attack, TransientMyocardial InfarctionStrokeAdolescentFollow-Up StudiesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topichealth economicsmyocardial infarctionstroke

Identifiers

PMID37185649
PMCPMC10151851

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.