Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37188965›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2023

Inadvertent human genomic bycatch and intentional capture raise beneficial applications and ethical concerns with environmental DNA.

Liam Whitmore, Mark McCauley, Jessica A Farrell, Maximilian R Stammnitz, Samantha A Koda, Narges Mashkour, Victoria Summers, Todd Osborne, Jenny Whilde, David J Duffy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sediment DNA can revolutionize archaeology-if it is used the right way.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liam Whitmore *Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL, USA.
Mark McCauley *Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5347-6860
Jessica A Farrell *Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL, USA.
Maximilian R StammnitzCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1704-9199
Samantha A KodaWhitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8751-3356
Narges MashkourWhitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL, USA.
Victoria SummersWhitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL, USA.
Todd OsborneWhitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3036-066X
Jenny WhildeWhitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL, USA.
David J DuffyWhitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience and Sea Turtle Hospital, University of Florida, St. Augustine, FL, USA. duffy@whitney.ufl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-8855

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) see paper for full list, not all funders saving correctly hereEuropean Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) EMBO long-term fellowship ALTF 544-2021Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology (IRCSET) IRC Government of Ireland Postgraduate Scholarship, GOIPG/2020/1056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of environmental DNA (eDNA) is advancing rapidly, yet human eDNA applications remain underutilized and underconsidered. Broader adoption of eDNA analysis will produce many well-recognized benefits for pathogen surveillance, biodiversity monitoring, endangered and invasive species detection, and population genetics. Here we show that deep-sequencing-based eDNA approaches capture genomic information from humans (Homo sapiens) just as readily as that from the intended target species. We term this phenomenon human genetic bycatch (HGB). Additionally, high-quality human eDNA could be intentionally recovered from environmental substrates (water, sand and air), holding promise for beneficial medical, forensic and environmental applications. However, this also raises ethical dilemmas, from consent, privacy and surveillance to data ownership, requiring further consideration and potentially novel regulation. We present evidence that human eDNA is readily detectable from 'wildlife' environmental samples as human genetic bycatch, demonstrate that identifiable human DNA can be intentionally recovered from human-focused environmental sampling and discuss the translational and ethical implications of such findings.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalBiodiversityDNAEnvironmental MonitoringGenomicsHumansDNADNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID37188965
PMCPMC10250199

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.