Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37190102›Full record

ReviewCells2023

The Therapeutic Potential of Non-Invasive and Invasive Cerebellar Stimulation Techniques in Hereditary Ataxias.

Alberto Benussi, Giorgi Batsikadze, Carina França, Rubens G Cury, Roderick P P W M Maas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06267222 (Trans-spinal Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Spinocerebellar Ataxia), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06267222 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Trans-spinal Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Spinocerebellar Ataxia: a Pragmatic Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaura Alice Santos de OliveiraRan2024 to 2024Enrolled45ConditionsSCA, Postural Balance, Gait AtaxiaArmsTRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION + exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Cerebellar Functions Beyond Movement and Learning.Annual review of neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Alberto BenussiNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8703-6940
Giorgi BatsikadzeDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0517-0119
Carina FrançaMovement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8036-2439
Rubens G CuryMovement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil.
Roderick P P W M MaasDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0823-1287
Universidade de São Paulo · BREssen University Hospital · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The degenerative ataxias comprise a heterogeneous group of inherited and acquired disorders that are characterized by a progressive cerebellar syndrome, frequently in combination with one or more extracerebellar signs. Specific disease-modifying interventions are currently not available for many of these rare conditions, which underscores the necessity of finding effective symptomatic therapies. During the past five to ten years, an increasing number of randomized controlled trials have been conducted examining the potential of different non-invasive brain stimulation techniques to induce symptomatic improvement. In addition, a few smaller studies have explored deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the dentate nucleus as an invasive means to directly modulate cerebellar output, thereby aiming to alleviate ataxia severity. In this paper, we comprehensively review the clinical and neurophysiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and dentate nucleus DBS in patients with hereditary ataxias, as well as the presumed underlying mechanisms at the cellular and network level and perspectives for future research.

Indexed as

Cerebellar AtaxiaSpinocerebellar DegenerationsTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAtaxiaCerebellumHumansTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationcellular mechanismscerebellar brain inhibitioncerebellumdegenerative cerebellar ataxiasdentate nucleus deep brain stimulationnetwork effectsnon-invasive brain stimulationtranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37190102
PMCPMC10137097
OpenAlexW4366596911

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.