SynthesisCurrent medicinal chemistry2024
Current Evidence on Dietary Factors and Kidney Allograft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Current medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Egg White Powder Supplementation on Nutritional Status, Biochemical Profile, and Oxidative Stress Markers in Diabetic Hemodialysis Patients; A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Changes in Body Composition Compartments After Kidney Transplantation: A One-Year Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Time for Change: A 3-Year Prospective Study on Mediterranean Diet Adherence and Body Composition in Kidney Transplant Recipients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Folate-Modified Curcumin-Loaded Nanoparticles for Overcoming Delivery Challenges in Cancer Treatment: A Narrative Review.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, there is no accounted-for consensus and practical standard when counseling diet modification for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). There are many differences between transplant centers regarding what KTRs are needed to follow a diet, what dietary factors and supplements are allowed, and how long KTRs should follow a modified diet. Relatively few scatter data are available for dietary factors in KTRs. Thus, we aimed to systematically review the literature on the purported dietary factors for kidney function.
methodsA systematic literature search was performed between February and March 2022 and updated in February 2023 using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. We included human observational and interventional studies that evaluated a dietary factor on kidney function and graft survival in KTRs. Data were extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed using established tools relevant to the study design.
resultsOf the 5341 citations retrieved, seven prospective cohorts, five cross-sectional, seventeen randomized, and ten non-randomized clinical trials were included that evaluated seven purported dietary factors. Almost half of the studies (n = 22; 56%) were classified as having a low degree of bias and sufficient support. Twenty-one studies (54%) reported a positive effect on KTRs. DASH and Mediterranean diets decreased graft failure, low-sodium diet reduced blood pressure, and antioxidants improved creatinine, GFR, and graft function. Of these, only twelve studies (31%) were at low risk of bias.
conclusionSome dietary factors, including DASH, Mediterranean, moderate protein, and low-- sodium diet, as well as antioxidants, may be associated with improved survival and kidney function in KTRs. However, more research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.