Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37191848›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2023

Comparison of Newly Proposed LDL-Cholesterol Estimation Equations.

Yong Whi Jeong, Jun Hyuk Koo, Ji Hye Huh, Young-Jin Kim, Hoyeon Jeong, Eun Young Kim, Dae Ryong Kang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yong Whi Jeong *Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4746-5764
Jun Hyuk Koo *Yonsei University Wonju Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, Wonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5743-9271
Ji Hye HuhDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5445-8007
Young-Jin KimSeoul Clinical Laboratories Biobank, Yongin, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4624-2705
Hoyeon JeongDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6812-9343
Eun Young KimDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Songho University, Hoengseong, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8014-7990
Dae Ryong KangDepartment of Precision Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea. dr.kang@yonsei.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8792-9730
Yonsei University · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRSongho University · KRYong In University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-density lipoprotein cholesterol is an important marker highly associated with cardiovascular disease. Since the direct measurement of it is inefficient in terms of cost and time, it is common to estimate through the Friedewald equation developed about 50 years ago. However, various limitations exist since the Friedewald equation was not designed for Koreans. This study proposes a new low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation equation for South Koreans using nationally approved statistical data.

methodsThis study used data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2009 to 2019. The 18,837 subjects were used to develop the equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The subjects included individuals with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels directly measured among those with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and total cholesterol measured. We compared twelve equations developed in the previous studies and the newly proposed equation (model 1) developed in this study with the actual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol value in various ways.

resultsThe low-density lipoprotein cholesterol value estimated using the estimation formula and the actual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol value were compared using the root mean squared error. When the triglyceride level was less than 400 mg/dL, the root mean squared of the model 1 was 7.96, the lowest compared to other equations, and the model 2 was 7.82. The degree of misclassification was checked according to the NECP ATP III 6 categories. As a result, the misclassification rate of the model 1 was the lowest at 18.9%, and Weighted Kappa was the highest at 0.919 (0.003), which means it significantly reduced the underestimation rate shown in other existing estimation equations. Root mean square error was also compared according to the change in triglycerides level. As the triglycerides level increased, the root mean square error showed an increasing trend in all equations, but it was confirmed that the model 1 was the lowest compared to other equations.

conclusionThe newly proposed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation equation showed significantly improved performance compared to the 12 existing estimation equations. The use of representative samples and external verification is required for more sophisticated estimates in the future.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLHumansNutrition SurveysTriglyceridesCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLTriglyceridesEstimation EquationFriedewald EquationLow-Density Lipoprotein CholesterolTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID37191848
PMCPMC10186074
OpenAlexW4366380084

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.