Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37194004›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023

Efficacy of perioperative duloxetine as a part of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgeries.

Diab Fuad Hetta, Montaser Abdelfatah Mohamed, Hany Ahmed Elmorabaa, Mirna Ismail Ahmed, Nourhan Alaa Elgalaly, Shereen Mamdouh Kamal

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diab Fuad HettaAnesthesia and intensive care and pain management department, South Egypt Cancer Institiue, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Montaser Abdelfatah MohamedAnesthesia and intensive care and pain management department, South Egypt Cancer Institiue, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Hany Ahmed ElmorabaaAnaesthesia, Intensive care and pain management department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Mirna Ismail AhmedAnesthesia and intensive care and pain management department, South Egypt Cancer Institiue, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Nourhan Alaa ElgalalyAnesthesia and intensive care and pain management department, South Egypt Cancer Institiue, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Shereen Mamdouh KamalAnesthesia and intensive care and pain management department, South Egypt Cancer Institiue, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. shereenmamdouh@aun.edu.eg.
Assiut University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough laparoscopic surgery provides earlier recovery, less morbidity and hospital stay, however, severe pain is still a problem after it. Duloxetine has been recently used in postoperative pain management. We tested perioperative duloxetine to evaluate its effect on patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

methodsSixty patients were enrolled in this study divided into two equal groups; duloxetine group each patient received an oral duloxetine capsule (60 mg) 1st dose at night before surgery, the 2nd dose 1 h preoperative, and the 3rd dose 24 h postoperative. Placebo group received placebo capsules at the same times. The cumulative morphine consumption in 48 h, postoperative VAS score, quality of recovery (QoR-40 score), sedation, and adverse effects were evaluated.

resultsDuloxetine group had lower VAS scores compared to placebo group, (3 ± 0.69) VS. (4.17 ± 0.83), (2.5 ± 0.6) VS. (4.3 ± 0.9), (2.2 ± 0.7) VS. (3.9 ± 0.6), (1.6 ± 0.7) VS. (3.6 ± 0.8), (1.1 ± 0.8) VS. (3.7 ± 0.7), (0.7 ± 0.7) VS. (3.5 ± 0.8), (0.6 ± 0.7) VS. (3.5 ± 0.8) respectively, P ˂0.01. The cumulative morphine consumption was significantly reduced in the Duloxetine group compared to the placebo group (4.6 ± 2.9 vs. 11.3 ± 1.7 mg), P < 0.01. The total QoR-40 score for duloxetine group was (180.8 ± 4.5) vs. (156 ± 5.9) in placebo group (P < 0.01). Patients in Duloxetine group were more sedated in all the 48 h postoperatively in comparison to placebo group.

conclusionsPerioperative duloxetine had reduced postoperative pain, decreased opioid consumption, and improved the quality of recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaColorectal NeoplasmsLaparoscopyAnalgesics, OpioidDouble-Blind MethodDuloxetine HydrochlorideHumansMorphinePostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidDuloxetine HydrochlorideMorphineColorectal cancer surgeryDuloxetineLaparoscopicMultimodal analgesiaPerioperative

Identifiers

PMID37194004
PMCPMC10186677
OpenAlexW4376872196

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.