Evidence mapPaperPMID 37200976Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

PCSK9 inhibitors for acute coronary syndrome: the era of early implementation.

Hongzhen Chen, Xiaomin Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongzhen ChenNingbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Xiaomin ChenNingbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Ningbo First Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, a new cholesterol-lowering strategy, can decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by inhibiting PCSK9 and reducing the degradation of LDL receptors; thus, they are impacting the management of dyslipidemia to the prevention of cardiovascular events. Recent guidelines recommend PCSK9 inhibitors for patients who fail to achieve target lipids after ezetimibe/statin therapy. As PCSK9 inhibitors have been demonstrated to significantly and safely reduce LDL-C, discussions have begun to explore its optimal timing in coronary artery disease, especially in subjects with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Also, their additional benefits, such as anti-inflammatory effects, plaque regression effects, and cardiovascular event prevention, have become the focus of recent research. Several studies, including EPIC-STEMI, suggest the lipid-lowering effects of early PCSK9 inhibitors in ACS patients, while some studies such as PACMAN-AMI suggest that early PCSK9 inhibitors can decelerate plaque progression and reduce short-term risks of cardiovascular events. Thus, PCSK9 inhibitors are entering the era of early implementation. In this review, we are committed to summarizing the multidimensional benefits of early implementation of PCSK9 inhibitors in ACS.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromecoronary heart diseaseearly implementationlow-density lipoprotein cholesterolPCSK9 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37200976
PMCPMC10185746
OpenAlexW4367852874

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.