ReviewJournal of cell communication and signaling2023
Significance of CCNs in liver regeneration.
Review in Journal of cell communication and signaling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of extracellular matrix in liver fibrosis regression and regeneration (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Photoresponsive mesoporous silica nanocarriers for paraquat with substantially reduced acute toxicity and effective weed control.Pest management science · 2026Article
- CCN1 drives asthmatic airway remodeling through amplification of TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Tubule-derived CCN1 drives renal repair via αCell death & disease · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic and proteomic integrated analysis reveals molecular mechanisms of 3D bioprinted vaginal scaffolds in vaginal regeneration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CCN5-Derived Peptide Ameliorates Liver Fibrosis in Mice through Inhibiting the ERK1/2 and PI3K Signaling Pathways.ACS omega · 2025Article
- CCN5 Drives Leydig Cell Aging and Testicular Dysfunction: Insights into Fibrosis, Lipid Dysregulation, and Therapeutic Potential.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- ECM Protein CYR61 Promotes Migration and Osteoblastic Differentiation of Irradiation BMSCs via Migrasomes.Stem cells international · 2025Article
- Decoding the pathogenesis of spermatogenic failure in cryptorchidism through single-cell transcriptomic profiling.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- Whole transcriptome sequencing revealed the gene regulatory network of hypoxic response in yak Sertoli cells.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- CCNs and other extracellular matrix proteins: an introduction to the special issue.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The liver has an inherent regenerative capacity via hepatocyte proliferation after mild-to-modest damage. When hepatocytes exhaust their replicative ability during chronic or severe liver damage, liver progenitor cells (LPC), also termed oval cells (OC) in rodents, are activated in the form of ductular reaction (DR) as an alternative pathway. LPC is often intimately associated with hepatic stellate cells (HSC) activation to promote liver fibrosis. The Cyr61/CTGF/Nov (CCN) protein family consists of six extracellular signaling modulators (CCN1-CCN6) with affinity to a repertoire of receptors, growth factors, and extracellular matrix proteins. Through these interactions, CCN proteins organize microenvironments and modulate cell signalings in a diverse variety of physiopathological processes. In particular, their binding to subtypes of integrin (αvβ5, αvβ3, α6β1, αvβ6, etc.) influences the motility and mobility of macrophages, hepatocytes, HSC, and LPC/OC during liver injury. This paper summarizes the current understanding of the significance of CCN genes in liver regeneration in relation to hepatocyte-driven or LPC/OC-mediated pathways. Publicly available datasets were also searched to compare dynamic levels of CCNs in developing and regenerating livers. These insights not only add to our understanding of the regenerative capability of the liver but also provide potential targets for the pharmacological management of liver repair in the clinical setting. Ccns in liver regeneration Restoring damaged or lost tissues requires robust cell growth and dynamic matrix remodeling. Ccns are matricellular proteins highly capable of influencing cell state and matrix production. Current studies have identified Ccns as active players in liver regeneration. Cell types, modes of action, and mechanisms of Ccn induction may vary depending on liver injuries. Hepatocyte proliferation is a default pathway for liver regeneration following mild-to-modest damages, working in parallel with the transient activation of stromal cells, such as macrophages and hepatic stellate cells (HSC). Liver progenitor cells (LPC), also termed oval cells (OC) in rodents, are activated in the form of ductular reaction (DR) and are associated with sustained fibrosis when hepatocytes lose their proliferative ability in severe or chronic liver damage. Ccns may facilitate both hepatocyte regeneration and LPC/OC repair via various mediators (growth factors, matrix proteins, integrins, etc.) for cell-specific and context-dependent functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.