ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
Modelling the structures of frameshift-stimulatory pseudoknots from representative bat coronaviruses.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying the interactions conferring functional mechanical rigidity on RNase-resistant RNA from Zika virus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Tying the knot: Unraveling the intricacies of the coronavirus frameshift pseudoknot.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronaviruses (CoVs) use -1 programmed ribosomal frameshifting stimulated by RNA pseudoknots in the viral genome to control expression of enzymes essential for replication, making CoV pseudoknots a promising target for anti-coronaviral drugs. Bats represent one of the largest reservoirs of CoVs and are the ultimate source of most CoVs infecting humans, including those causing SARS, MERS, and COVID-19. However, the structures of bat-CoV frameshift-stimulatory pseudoknots remain largely unexplored. Here we use a combination of blind structure prediction followed by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to model the structures of eight pseudoknots that, together with the SARS-CoV-2 pseudoknot, are representative of the range of pseudoknot sequences in bat CoVs. We find that they all share some key qualitative features with the pseudoknot from SARS-CoV-2, notably the presence of conformers with two distinct fold topologies differing in whether or not the 5' end of the RNA is threaded through a junction, and similar conformations for stem 1. However, they differed in the number of helices present, with half sharing the 3-helix architecture of the SARS-CoV-2 pseudoknot but two containing 4 helices and two others only 2. These structure models should be helpful for future work studying bat-CoV pseudoknots as potential therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.