Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206258›Full record

ArticleEJHaem2023

Janus kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib in combination with nilotinib and prednisone in patients with myelofibrosis (RuNiC study): A phase Ib, multicenter study.

Rosa Ayala, Rafael Alonso Fernández, Valentín García-Gutiérrez, Alberto Alvarez-Larrán, Santiago Osorio, Jose M Sánchez-Pina, Gonzalo Carreño-Tarragona, Noemi Álvarez, María Teresa Gómez-Casares, Antonia Duran and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJHaem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Rosa AyalaHaematological Malignancies Clinical Research Unit Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense, CNIO, CIBERONC Madrid Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2699-8353
Rafael Alonso FernándezHematology Department Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3774-118X
Valentín García-GutiérrezHematology Department Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal Madrid Spain.
Alberto Alvarez-LarránHematology Department Hospital ClíNic Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6387-4619
Santiago OsorioHematology Department Hospital General U Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain.
Jose M Sánchez-PinaHematology Department Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9181-0900
Gonzalo Carreño-TarragonaHematology Department Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain.
Noemi ÁlvarezDepartment of Translational Hematology Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Madrid Spain.
María Teresa Gómez-CasaresHematology Department Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain.
Antonia DuranHematology Department Hospital Universitario Son Espases Palma de Mallorca Spain.
Julian GorrochategiVivia Biotech S.L. Tres Cantos Madrid Spain.
Juan Carlos Hernández-BoludaHospital Clínico Universitario-INCLIVA Valencia Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4289-3113
Joaquín Martínez-LópezHaematological Malignancies Clinical Research Unit Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense, CNIO, CIBERONC Madrid Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5904-0902
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Universitario Son Espases · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESSOM Biotech (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This phase Ib, non-randomized, open-label study evaluates the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib in combination with nilotinib and prednisone in patients with naïve or ruxolitinib-resistant myelofibrosis (MF). A total of 15 patients with primary or secondary MF received the study treatment; 13 patients had received prior ruxolitinib treatment (86.7%). Eight patients completed seven cycles (53.3%) and six patients completed twelve cycles of treatment (40%). All the patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE) during the study (the most common AEs were hyperglycemia, asthenia, and thrombocytopenia), and 14 patients registered at least one treatment-related AE (the most common treatment-related AEs were hyperglycemia (22.2%; three grade 3 cases). Five treatment-related serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in two patients (13.3%). No deaths were registered throughout the study. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Four out of fifteen (27%) patients experienced a 100% spleen size reduction at Cycle 7, and two additional patients achieved a >50% spleen size reduction, representing an overall response rate of 40% at Cycle 7. In conclusion, the tolerability of this combination was acceptable, and hyperglycemia was the most frequent treatment-related AE. Ruxolitinib in combination with nilotinib and prednisone showed relevant clinical activity in patients with MF. This trial was registered with EudraCT Number 2016-005214-21.

Indexed as

combination therapymyelofibrosisnilotinibprednisoneruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID37206258
PMCPMC10188506
OpenAlexW4366003582

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.