Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37207237›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2023

Use of big data from health insurance for assessment of cardiovascular outcomes.

Johannes Krefting, Partho Sen, Diana David-Rus, Ulrich Güldener, Johann S Hawe, Salvatore Cassese, Moritz von Scheidt, Heribert Schunkert

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial intelligence applications in health insurances: a scoping review.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2025
    Review
  2. AI revolution in insurance: bridging research and reality.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes KreftingDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Partho SenDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Diana David-RusDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Ulrich GüldenerDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Johann S HaweDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Salvatore CasseseDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Moritz von ScheidtDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Heribert SchunkertDepartment of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcome research that supports guideline recommendations for primary and secondary preventions largely depends on the data obtained from clinical trials or selected hospital populations. The exponentially growing amount of real-world medical data could enable fundamental improvements in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prediction, prevention, and care. In this review we summarize how data from health insurance claims (HIC) may improve our understanding of current health provision and identify challenges of patient care by implementing the perspective of patients (providing data and contributing to society), physicians (identifying at-risk patients, optimizing diagnosis and therapy), health insurers (preventive education and economic aspects), and policy makers (data-driven legislation). HIC data has the potential to inform relevant aspects of the healthcare systems. Although HIC data inherit limitations, large sample sizes and long-term follow-up provides enormous predictive power. Herein, we highlight the benefits and limitations of HIC data and provide examples from the cardiovascular field, i.e. how HIC data is supporting healthcare, focusing on the demographical and epidemiological differences, pharmacotherapy, healthcare utilization, cost-effectiveness and outcomes of different treatments. As an outlook we discuss the potential of using HIC-based big data and modern artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to guide patient education and care, which could lead to the development of a learning healthcare system and support a medically relevant legislation in the future.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebig datahealthcare researchhealth insurance claimsmachine learningpredictionprevention

Identifiers

PMID37207237
PMCPMC10188985
OpenAlexW4368376590

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.