Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37212958›Full record

ArticlePsicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS2023

Impact of COVID-19 on quality of life in Peruvian older adults: construct validity, reliability and invariance of the COV19-Impact on Quality of Life (COV19-QoL) measurement.

Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Carlos Carbajal-León, Lindsey W Vilca, Mario Reyes-Bossio, Miguel Gallegos, Renzo Carranza Esteban, Martin Noe-Grijalva, Walter L Arias Gallegos, Mariel Delgado-Campusano, Águeda Muñoz-Del-Carpio-Toia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Tomás Caycho-RodríguezFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Científica del Sur, Campus Villa II, Ctra. Panamericana S 19, Villa EL Salvador, Lima, Peru. tcaycho@cientifica.edu.pe.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5349-7570
Carlos Carbajal-LeónSouth American Center for Education and Research in Public Health, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Lindsey W VilcaSouth American Center for Education and Research in Public Health, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Mario Reyes-BossioFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.
Miguel GallegosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Pontificia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, State of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Renzo Carranza EstebanFacultad de Ciencias de La Salud, Grupo de Investigación Avances en Investigación Psicológica, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú.
Martin Noe-GrijalvaEscuela de Psicología, Universidad César Vallejo, Trujillo, Perú.
Walter L Arias GallegosDepartamento de Psicología, Universidad Católica San Pablo, Arequipa, Perú.
Mariel Delgado-CampusanoFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.
Águeda Muñoz-Del-Carpio-ToiaEscuela de Medicina Humana, Universidad Católica de Santa María, Arequipa, Perú.
Peruvian University of Applied Sciences · PEUniversidad Norbert Wiener · PECatholic University of Santa María · PEPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidad Católica San Pablo · PEUniversidad César Vallejo · PEUniversidad Científica del Sur · PEUniversidad San Ignacio de Loyola · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to translate into Spanish and evaluate the psychometric evidence of the Impact on Quality of Life (COV19-QoL) applied to a sample of Peruvian older adults (N = 298; 58.1% women, 41.9% men, mean age 65.34 years [SD = 11.33]). The study used techniques from the Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). The findings confirmed the single factor structure of the COV19-QoL, high internal consistency reliability, measurement invariance by gender, and all items demonstrated adequate discrimination and difficulty indices. In this sense, the items allow adequate discrimination between low, medium and high levels of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on quality of life. In addition, a greater perceived impact of the pandemic on quality of life is necessary to answer the higher response options of the COV19-QoL. In conclusion, the COV19-QoL is a valid measurement scale of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life of Peruvian older adults.

Indexed as

COV19-QoLOlder adultsQuality of lifeValidity

Identifiers

PMID37212958
PMCPMC10201493
OpenAlexW4377221123

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.