ArticlePhotoacoustics2023
Performance evaluation of mesoscopic photoacoustic imaging.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Photoacoustic imaging for cutaneous melanoma assessment: a comprehensive review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Pooled it
- Early Radiation Therapy Response Assessment Using Multi-Scale Photoacoustic Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Enhanced maximum intensity projection (eMIP) for improving the fidelity of optoacoustic images.Npj imaging · 2025Article
- Artifacts in photoacoustic imaging: Origins and mitigations.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Performance evaluation of image co-registration methods in photoacoustic mesoscopy of the vasculature.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Unsupervised Segmentation of 3D Microvascular Photoacoustic Images Using Deep Generative Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Tutorial on phantoms for photoacoustic imaging applications.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Photoacoustic mesoscopy visualises vascular architecture at high-resolution up to ~3 mm depth. Despite promise in preclinical and clinical imaging studies, with applications in oncology and dermatology, the accuracy and precision of photoacoustic mesoscopy is not well established. Here, we evaluate a commercial photoacoustic mesoscopy system for imaging vascular structures. Typical artefact types are first highlighted and limitations due to non-isotropic illumination and detection are evaluated with respect to rotation, angularity, and depth of the target. Then, using tailored phantoms and mouse models, we investigate system precision, showing coefficients of variation (COV) between repeated scans [short term (1 h): COV= 1.2%; long term (25 days): COV= 9.6%], from target repositioning (without: COV=1.2%, with: COV=4.1%), or from varying
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.