Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214444›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2023

Pharmacological treatment and vaccines in monkeypox virus: a narrative review and bibliometric analysis.

Muhammad Aaqib Shamim, Prakisini Satapathy, Bijaya Kumar Padhi, Sai Dutt Veeramachaneni, Naushaba Akhtar, Anindita Pradhan, Abhimanyu Agrawal, Pradeep Dwivedi, Aroop Mohanty, Keerti Bhusan Pradhan and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Rethinking mpox: epidemiology, clinical variants, diagnosis, and response.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. First Comprehensive Global Bibliometric Analysis of Monkeypox Virus Research Landscape From 1976 to 2025.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

Muhammad Aaqib ShamimDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Prakisini SatapathyDepartment of Virology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Bijaya Kumar PadhiDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sai Dutt VeeramachaneniPSG College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore, India.
Naushaba AkhtarIndian Council of Medical Research-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, India.
Anindita PradhanDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Abhimanyu AgrawalDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, India.
Pradeep DwivediDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Aroop MohantyAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, India.
Keerti Bhusan PradhanDepartment of Healthcare Management, Chitkara University, Chandigarh, India.
Russell KabirSchool of Allied Health, Anglia Ruskin University, Essex, United Kingdom.
Ali A RabaanMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Jawaher AlotaibiInfectious Diseases Unit, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Department of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Zainab A Al IsmailLong Term Care Department, Dhahran Long Term Hospital, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Zainab Ahmed AlsoliabiPharmacy Department, Qatif Central Hospital, Qatif, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Al FraijMedical Laboratories and Blood Bank Department, Jubail Health Network, Jubail, Saudi Arabia.
Ranjit SahTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INAnglia Ruskin University · GBChitkara University · INDhahran Health Center · SADr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · INJubail Industrial College · SAKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SALebanese American University · LBQatif Central Hospital · SARegional Medical Research Centre · INSaudi Aramco Medical Services Organization · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mpox (earlier known as monkeypox) virus infection is a recognized public health emergency. There has been little research on the treatment options. This article reviews the specific drugs used to treat mpox virus infection and the vaccines used here. Instead of focusing on the mechanistic basis, this review narrates the practical, real-life experiences of individual patients of mpox virus disease being administered these medicines. We conducted a bibliometric analysis on the treatment of the mpox virus using data from several databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. The research on this topic has grown tremendously recently but it is highly concentrated in a few countries. Cidofovir is the most studied drug. This is because it is indicated and also used off-label for several conditions. The drugs used for mpox virus infection include tecovirimat, cidofovir, brincidofovir, vaccinia immune globulin, and trifluridine. Tecovirimat is used most frequently. It is a promising option in progressive mpox disease in terms of both efficacy and safety. Brincidofovir has been associated with treatment discontinuation due to elevated hepatic enzymes. Cidofovir is also not the preferred drug, often used because of the unavailability of tecovirimat. Trifluridine is used topically as an add-on agent along with tecovirimat for ocular manifestations of mpox virus disease. No study reports individual patient data for vaccinia immune globulin. Though no vaccine is currently approved for mpox virus infection, ACAM 2000 and JYNNEOS are the vaccines being mainly considered. ACAM 2000 is capable of replicating and may cause severe adverse reactions. It is used when JYNNEOS is contraindicated. Several drugs and vaccines are under development and have been discussed alongside pragmatic aspects of mpox virus treatment and prevention. Further studies can provide more insight into the safety and efficacy of Tecovirimat in actively progressing mpox virus disease.

Indexed as

antiviralbibliometrycidofovirdrugmanagementmpox infectionpublic health emergencytecovirimat

Identifiers

PMID37214444
PMCPMC10196034
OpenAlexW4377564987

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.