ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2023
[Pain after panretinal photocoagulation: 50-millisecond pulse versus conventional pulse].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic retinopathy is a progressive disfunction of blood vessels of the retina secondary to chronic hyperglycemia. There are several treatments, out of which panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) stands out. Objective: To compare the level of pain in patients undergoing PRP with different impulse. Material and methods: Comparative, cross-sectional study that compared the level of pain in patients undergoing PRP with a 50-millisecond pulse (group A) versus conventional 200 milliseconds pulse (group B). Mann-Whitney U test was used. Results: There were 26 patients, 12 (46.16%) female and 14 (53.84%) males. The median age was 58.73 ± 7.31 (40-75) years. 40 eyes were studied, 18 (45%) right and 22 (55%) left. The mean level of glycated hemoglobin was 8.15 ± 1.08 (6.5-12) %. The mean laser power was 297 ± 53.61 (200-380) and 214.5 ± 41.73 (170-320) milliwatts; the mean fluence was 18.85 ± 5.28 (12-28) J/cm2 and 65.9 ± 12.87 (52-98) J/cm2; the mean level of pain was 3.1 ± 1.33 (1-5) and 7.5 ± 1.23 (6-10) points for group A and B, respectively, and there was statistically significant difference (p ˂ 0.001) in the level of pain. There were no complications in any group. Conclusion: The application of retinal 50-millisecond pulse PRP causes less pain and side effects than 200-millisecond pulse PRP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37216469PMC10437225W4377565725What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.