Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217447›Full record

ArticleThe journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians2023

Maternal stress during the third trimester of pregnancy and the neonatal microbiome.

Sandra J Weiss, Maryam Hamidi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra J WeissDepartment of Community Health Systems, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Maryam HamidiSchool of Health and Natural Sciences, Dominican University of California, San Rafael, CA, USA.
Dominican University of California · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Antenatal Corticosteroids, Maternal Depression and Preterm Infant Stress ResponseR01HD081188 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WEISS, SANDRA JEAN · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Perinatal Precursors of Early Microbiome Development.R01HD102604 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LYNCH, SUSAN VERONICA, WEISS, SANDRA JEAN · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
Biobehavioral Research Training Program in Symptom ScienceT32NR016920 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MIASKOWSKI, CHRISTINE A., WEISS, SANDRA JEAN · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081188NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD102604NINR NIH HHS T32 NR016920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPreliminary research suggests that maternal prenatal stress may alter the development of the fetal microbiome and resulting microbial composition after birth. However, the findings of existing studies are mixed and inconclusive. The purpose of this exploratory study was to assess whether maternal stress during pregnancy is associated with the overall number and diversity of various microbial species in the infant gut microbiome or the abundance of specific bacterial taxa.

methodsFifty-one women were recruited during their third trimester of pregnancy. The women completed a demographic questionnaire and Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale at recruitment. A stool sample was collected from their neonate at one month of age. Data on potential confounders, such as gestational age and mode of delivery, were extracted from medical records to control for their effects. 16s rRNA gene sequencing was used to identify the diversity and abundance of microbial species, along with multiple linear regression models to examine the effects of prenatal stress on microbial diversity. We employed negative binomial generalized linear models to test for differential expression of various microbial taxa among infants exposed to prenatal stress and those not exposed to prenatal stress.

resultsMore severe symptoms of prenatal stress were associated with a greater diversity of microbial species in the gut microbiome of neonates (β = .30,

conclusionsFindings suggest that mild to moderate stress exposure in utero could be associated with a microbial environment in early life that is more optimally prepared to thrive in a stressful postnatal environment. Adaptation of gut microbiota under conditions of stress may involve upregulation of bacterial species, including certain protective microorganisms (e.g.

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeChildFemaleFetusHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sfetal exposurematernal stressMicrobiomeneonatepregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37217447
PMCPMC11062404
OpenAlexW4377293892

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.