Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37218167›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2023

Detecting aberrant DNA methylation in Illumina DNA methylation arrays: a toolbox and recommendations for its use.

Bradley M Downs, Sara-Jayne Thursby, Leslie Cope

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bradley M DownsDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6156-510X
Sara-Jayne ThursbyDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Leslie CopeDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, our goal was to determine probe-specific thresholds for identifying aberrant, or outlying, DNA methylation and to provide guidance on the relative merits of using continuous or outlier methylation data. To construct a reference database, we downloaded Illumina Human 450K array data for more than 2,000 normal samples, characterized the distribution of DNA methylation and derived probe-specific thresholds for identifying aberrations. We made the decision to restrict our reference database to solid normal tissue and morphologically normal tissue found adjacent to solid tumours, excluding blood which has very distinctive patterns of DNA methylation. Next, we explored the utility of our outlier thresholds in several analyses that are commonly performed on DNA methylation data. Outliers are as effective as the full continuous dataset for simple tasks, like distinguishing tumour tissue from normal, but becomes less useful as the complexity of the problem increases. We developed an R package called OutlierMeth containing our thresholds, as well as functions for applying them to data.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationCpG IslandsDatabases, FactualHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysiscancerDNA methylationepigenomeIllumina 450K human methylation array

Identifiers

PMID37218167
PMCPMC10208159

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.