Evidence mapPaperPMID 37218848Full record

ReviewJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2023

Fiber-Type-Specific Hypertrophy with the Use of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training: A Systematic Review.

Brad J Schoenfeld, Dan Ogborn, Alec Piñero, Ryan Burke, Max Coleman, Nicholas Rolnick

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Brad J SchoenfeldDepartment of Exercise Science and Recreation, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.
Dan OgbornDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.
Alec PiñeroDepartment of Exercise Science and Recreation, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8186-1889
Ryan BurkeDepartment of Exercise Science and Recreation, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1201-2685
Max ColemanDepartment of Exercise Science and Recreation, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.
Nicholas RolnickDepartment of Exercise Science and Recreation, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0430-5015
Lehman College · USPan Am Clinic · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence indicates that the use of low-load resistance training in combination with blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) can be an effective method to elicit increases in muscle size, with most research showing similar whole muscle development of the extremities compared to high-load (HL) training. It is conceivable that properties unique to LL-BFR such as greater ischemia, reperfusion, and metabolite accumulation may enhance the stress on type I fibers during training compared to the use of LLs without occlusion. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper was to systematically review the relevant literature on the fiber-type-specific response to LL-BFR and provide insights into future directions for research. A total of 11 studies met inclusion criteria. Results of the review suggest that the magnitude of type I fiber hypertrophy is at least as great, and sometimes greater, than type II hypertrophy when performing LL-BFR. This finding is in contrast to HL training, where the magnitude of type II fiber hypertrophy tends to be substantially greater than that of type I myofibers. However, limited data directly compare training with LL-BFR to nonoccluded LL or HL conditions, thus precluding the ability to draw strong inferences as to whether the absolute magnitude of type I hypertrophy is indeed greater in LL-BFR vs. traditional HL training. Moreover, it remains unclear as to whether combining LL-BFR with traditional HL training may enhance whole muscle hypertrophy via greater increases in type I myofiber cross-sectional area.

Indexed as

cross-sectional areafiber typekatsumuscle growthocclusion

Identifiers

PMID37218848
PMCPMC10204387
OpenAlexW4367316082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.