Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37220886›Full record

ReviewJournal of Crohn's & colitis2023

Patient and Public Involvement in Research: Lessons for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Sailish Honap, Anne Buisson, Silvio Danese, Laurent Beaugerie, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: An International Delphi Consensus on Clinical Trial Design and Endpoints.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sailish HonapDepartment of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6657-2763
Anne BuissonAFA Crohn RCH, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4249-194X
Silvio DaneseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7341-1351
Laurent BeaugerieDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5012-4146
Laurent Peyrin-BirouletDepartment of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, University Hospital of Nancy, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2536-6618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participatory research, also referred to as patient and public involvement, is an approach that involves collaborating with patients affected by the focus of the research, on the design, development and delivery of research to improve outcomes. There are two broad justifications for this: first, that it enhances the quality and relevance of research, and second, that it satisfies the ethical argument for patient inclusion in decisions about them. This synergistic and collaborative effort, which bridges the divide between researchers and participants with the lived condition, is now a mainstream activity and widely accepted as best practice. Although there has been a substantial increase in the literature over the past two decades, little has been published on how participatory research has been used in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] research and little guidance as to how researchers should go about this. With an increasing incidence and prevalence worldwide, combined with declining study enrolment in an era of perennial unmet need, there are a multitude of benefits of participatory research to IBD patients and investigators, including research output that is informed and relevant to the real world. A key example of participatory research in IBD is the I-CARE study, a large-scale, pan-European observational study assessing the safety of advanced therapies, which had significant patient involvement throughout the study. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the benefits and challenges of participatory research and discuss opportunities of building strategic alliances between IBD patients, healthcare providers and academics to strengthen research outcomes.

Indexed as

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesHumansObservational Studies as TopicPatient Participationinflammatory bowel diseaseparticipatory researchPatient and public involvement

Identifiers

PMID37220886
PMCPMC10673804

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.