Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37224703›Full record

SynthesisSocial science & medicine (1982)2023

Effectiveness of father-inclusive interventions on maternal, paternal, couples, and early child outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Joshua Jeong, Eileen F Sullivan, Juliet K McCann

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Social science & medicine (1982), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of themedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua JeongDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: joshua.jeong@hsph.harvard.edu.
Eileen F SullivanHarvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Juliet K McCannDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Global Health Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Engaging and Supporting Fathers: A Parenting Intervention to Improve Early Child Development in TanzaniaK99HD105984 · NICHD · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI JEONG, JOSHUA · 2021 to 2022
$257k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD105984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most caregiving interventions for young children are directed to female caregivers. Relatively few have included male caregivers as program participants especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The range of potential benefits that can be achieved through the engagement of fathers and male caregivers has not been adequately explored from a family systems perspective. We reviewed interventions that engaged male caregivers to support young children in LMICs and summarized impacts on maternal, paternal, couples, and child outcomes. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Global Health Library for quantitative evaluation studies of social and behavioral interventions that included fathers or other male caregivers to improve nurturing care for young children under 5 years of age in LMICs. Three authors independently extracted data using a structured form. Forty-four articles, representing 33 intervention evaluations, were included. The most common type of intervention targeted fathers along with their female partners and primarily to address child nutrition and health. Across interventions, maternal outcomes were the most evaluated outcomes (82%), followed by paternal (58%), couple's relationship (48%) and child-level outcomes (45%). Overall, father-inclusive interventions had positive impacts on maternal, paternal and couples' relationship outcomes. Although there was greater variation in the degree of supportive evidence for child outcomes compared to maternal, paternal, and couples outcomes, findings suggested mostly positive effects across all outcomes. Limitations included relatively weak study designs and heterogeneity across interventions, outcome types, and measurement tools. Interventions that include fathers and other male caregivers have potential to improve maternal and paternal caregiving, couple's relationships dynamics, and early child outcomes in LMICs. More evaluation studies, using rigorous methods and robust measurement frameworks, is needed to bolster this evidence-base about the effect of fathers' engagement for young children, caregivers, and families in LMICs.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesFathersCaregiversChild, PreschoolFemaleGlobal HealthHumansMaleEffectivenessFathersInterventionsLow- and middle-income countriesMale engagement

Identifiers

PMID37224703
PMCPMC10330563
OpenAlexW4376636015

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.