Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37227626›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2023

A Decision Framework for Selecting Critically Important Nutrients from Aquatic Foods.

Jessica Zamborain-Mason, Daniel Viana, Khristopher Nicholas, Erin D Jackson, J Zachary Koehn, Simone Passarelli, Seo-Hyun Yoo, Angela W Zhang, Hannah C Davin, Christopher P Duggan and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Global nutritional equity of fishmeal and aquaculture trade flows.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jessica Zamborain-MasonDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. jzm@hsph.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4705-0166
Daniel VianaDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Khristopher NicholasDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Erin D JacksonDivision of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
J Zachary KoehnStanford Center for Ocean Solutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Simone PassarelliOffice of Global Food Security, U.S. Department of State, Washington, D.C, 20502, USA.
Seo-Hyun YooDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Angela W ZhangEmerson Fellowship, Congressional Hunger Center, Washington, D.C, 20502, USA.
Hannah C DavinDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Christopher P DugganDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Josef SchmidhuberMarkets and Trade Division, FAO, Rome, Italy.
Christopher D GoldenDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAquatic foods are increasingly being recognized as a diverse, bioavailable source of nutrients, highlighting the importance of fisheries and aquaculture for human nutrition. However, studies focusing on the nutrient supply of aquatic foods often differ in the nutrients they examine, potentially biasing their contribution to nutrition security and leading to ineffective policies or management decisions. RECENT

findingsWe create a decision framework to effectively select nutrients in aquatic food research based on three key domains: human physiological importance, nutritional needs of the target population (demand), and nutrient availability in aquatic foods compared to other accessible dietary sources (supply). We highlight 41 nutrients that are physiologically important, exemplify the importance of aquatic foods relative to other food groups in the food system in terms of concentration per 100 g and apparent consumption, and provide future research pathways that we consider of high importance for aquatic food nutrition. Overall, our study provides a framework to select focal nutrients in aquatic food research and ensures a methodical approach to quantifying the importance of aquatic foods for nutrition security and public health.

Indexed as

NutrientsNutritional StatusAquacultureDietFisheriesHumansNutrientsAquacultureBlue foodsFisheriesFood and nutrition securityMacronutrientsMicronutrientsPlanetary healthPublic health

Identifiers

PMID37227626
PMCPMC10299940

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.