Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37228745›Full record

ReviewCell genomics2023

CRISPR-based functional genomics screening in human-pluripotent-stem-cell-derived cell types.

Kun Li, Miao Ouyang, Jiangshan Zhan, Ruilin Tian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kun LiDepartment of Medical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province 518055, China.
Miao OuyangDepartment of Medical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province 518055, China.
Jiangshan ZhanDepartment of Medical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province 518055, China.
Ruilin TianDepartment of Medical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province 518055, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While our knowledge of gene expression in different human cell types is rapidly expanding with advances in transcriptomic profiling technologies, the next challenge is to understand gene function in each cell type. CRISPR-Cas9-based functional genomics screening offers a powerful approach to determine gene function in a high-throughput manner. With the maturation of stem cell technology, a variety of human cell types can be derived from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). Recently, the integration of CRISPR screening with hPSC differentiation technologies opens up unprecedented opportunities to systematically examine gene function in different human cell types and identify mechanisms and therapeutic targets for human diseases. This review highlights recent progress in the development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9-based functional genomics screening in hPSC-derived cell types, discusses current challenges and limitations, and outlines future directions for this emerging field.

Indexed as

cell differentiationCRISPR technologyfunctional genomicsgenetic screenshuman pluripotent stem cells

Identifiers

PMID37228745
PMCPMC10203043

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.