Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37228762›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023

Development and validation of a clinical cure marker based on negative lymph nodes for gastric cancer after gastrectomy.

Jiebin Xie, Yuan Zhang, Ming He, Xu Liu, Jing Dong, Pan Wang, Yueshan Pang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiebin XieDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Yuan ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Ming HeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Xu LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Jing DongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Pan WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Yueshan PangDepartment of Geriatrics, Central Hospital of Nanchong, The Second Clinical School of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College · CNNorth Sichuan Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore lymph node (LN)-related derived indicators as clinical cure markers for gastric cancer (GC) after gastrectomy. Methods: Data of resected GC patients were extracted from the SEER database and our own department. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline differences between the clinical cure and the nonclinical cure groups. The area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to choose the optimal marker, and survival analysis was used to validate the clinical value of the most effective marker. Results: After PSM, the differences in age, sex, race, location, surgical type, and histologic type between the two groups were significantly reduced (all P > 0.05), and the AUCs of examined LNs (ELNs), negative LNs (NLNs), ESR (ELNs/tumor size), ETR (ELNs/T-stage), NSR (NLNs/tumor size), NTR (NLNs/T-stage), EPR (ELNs/PLNs) and NPR (NLNs/PLNs) were 0.522, 0.625, 0.622, 0.692, 0.706, 0.751, 7.43, and 7.50, respectively. When NTR was 5.9, the Youden index of 0.378 was the highest. The sensitivity and specificity were 67.5% and 70.3% in the training group and 66.79% and 67.8% in the validation group, respectively. DCA showed that NTR had the largest net clinical benefit, and patients with NTR greater than 5.9 had significantly prolonged overall survival in our own cohort. Conclusion: NLNs, NTR, NSR, ESR, ETR, NPR and EPR can be used as clinical cure markers. However, NTR was the most effective, and the best cutoff value was 5.9.

Indexed as

diagnostic markersgastric cancernegative lymph nodenegative lymph node/T stageprognosis

Identifiers

PMID37228762
PMCPMC10203492
OpenAlexW4378348803

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.