ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
TSPTFBS 2.0: trans-species prediction of transcription factor binding sites and identification of their core motifs in plants.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- PlantGFM: A Genomic Foundation Model for Discovery and Creation of Plant Genes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Genome-wide modelling of plant transcription factor binding captures regulatory variants associated with phenotypic traits.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Application of deep learning in crop research: From genomics to phenomics.The plant genome · 2026Review
- UniChrom: a universal deep learning architecture for cross-scale chromatin interaction prediction.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genome-wide identification and functional roles relating to anthocyanin biosynthesis analysis in maize.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of computational approaches in plant transcription factors binding regions discovery.Heliyon · 2024Article
- PTFSpot: deep co-learning on transcription factors and their binding regions attains impeccable universality in plants.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Recent advances in exploring transcriptional regulatory landscape of crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: An emerging approach using promoter tiling deletion via genome editing is beginning to become popular in plants. Identifying the precise positions of core motifs within plant gene promoter is of great demand but they are still largely unknown. We previously developed TSPTFBS of 265 Methods: Here, we additionally introduced 104 maize and 20 rice TFBS datasets and utilized DenseNet for model construction on a large-scale dataset of a total of 389 plant TFs. More importantly, we combined three biological interpretability methods including DeepLIFT, Results: For the results, DenseNet not only has achieved greater predictability than baseline methods such as LS-GKM and MEME for above 389 TFs from Arabidopsis, maize and rice, but also has greater performance on trans-species prediction of a total of 15 TFs from other six plant species. A motif analysis based on TF-MoDISco and global importance analysis (GIA) further provide the biological implication of the core motif identified by three interpretability methods. Finally, we developed a pipeline of TSPTFBS 2.0, which integrates 389 DenseNet-based models of TF binding and the above three interpretability methods. Discussion: TSPTFBS 2.0 was implemented as a user-friendly web-server (http://www.hzau-hulab.com/TSPTFBS/), which can support important references for editing targets of any given plant promoters and it has great potentials to provide reliable editing target of genetic screen experiments in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.