Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37229121›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

TSPTFBS 2.0: trans-species prediction of transcription factor binding sites and identification of their core motifs in plants.

Huiling Cheng, Lifen Liu, Yuying Zhou, Kaixuan Deng, Yuanxin Ge, Xuehai Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PlantGFM: A Genomic Foundation Model for Discovery and Creation of Plant Genes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huiling ChengCollege of Informatics, Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lifen LiuCollege of Informatics, Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yuying ZhouCollege of Informatics, Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Kaixuan DengCollege of Informatics, Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yuanxin GeCollege of Informatics, Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xuehai HuCollege of Informatics, Hubei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: An emerging approach using promoter tiling deletion via genome editing is beginning to become popular in plants. Identifying the precise positions of core motifs within plant gene promoter is of great demand but they are still largely unknown. We previously developed TSPTFBS of 265 Methods: Here, we additionally introduced 104 maize and 20 rice TFBS datasets and utilized DenseNet for model construction on a large-scale dataset of a total of 389 plant TFs. More importantly, we combined three biological interpretability methods including DeepLIFT, Results: For the results, DenseNet not only has achieved greater predictability than baseline methods such as LS-GKM and MEME for above 389 TFs from Arabidopsis, maize and rice, but also has greater performance on trans-species prediction of a total of 15 TFs from other six plant species. A motif analysis based on TF-MoDISco and global importance analysis (GIA) further provide the biological implication of the core motif identified by three interpretability methods. Finally, we developed a pipeline of TSPTFBS 2.0, which integrates 389 DenseNet-based models of TF binding and the above three interpretability methods. Discussion: TSPTFBS 2.0 was implemented as a user-friendly web-server (http://www.hzau-hulab.com/TSPTFBS/), which can support important references for editing targets of any given plant promoters and it has great potentials to provide reliable editing target of genetic screen experiments in plants.

Indexed as

biological interpretabilitycore motifDenseNettranscription factor binding sitestrans-species prediction

Identifiers

PMID37229121
PMCPMC10203575
OpenAlexW4378347936

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.