ArticleNew generation computing2023
Deep Learning Model for COVID-19 Sentiment Analysis on Twitter.
Article in New generation computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges issues and future recommendations of deep learning techniques for SARS-CoV-2 detection utilising X-ray and CT images: a comprehensive review.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- A systematic review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning approaches in Mexico: challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Global Public Health and Risk Modelling Framework Using an Environmental Deep Neural Network, Sentiment Classification with Text Mining and Emotional Reactions from COVID-19 Vaccination Tweets.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the mood of the people, and this was evident on social networks. These common user publications are a source of information to measure the population's opinion on social phenomena. In particular, the Twitter network represents a resource of great value due to the amount of information, the geographical distribution of the publications and the openness to dispose of them. This work presents a study on the feelings of the population in Mexico during one of the waves that produced the most contagion and deaths in this country. A mixed, semi-supervised approach was used, with a lexical-based data labeling technique to later bring these data to a pre-trained model of Transformers completely in Spanish. Two Spanish-language models were trained by adding to the Transformers neural network the adjustment for the sentiment analysis task specifically on COVID-19. In addition, ten other multilanguage Transformer models including the Spanish language were trained with the same data set and parameters to compare their performance. In addition, other classifiers with the same data set were used for training and testing, such as Support Vector Machines, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, and Decision Trees. These performances were compared with the exclusive model in Spanish based on Transformers, which had higher precision. Finally, this model was used, developed exclusively based on the Spanish language, with new data, to measure the sentiment about COVID-19 of the Twitter community in Mexico.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.