Evidence mapPaperPMID 37229383Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Comparison of the probability of four anticonvulsant mood stabilizers to facilitate polycystic ovary syndrome in women with epilepsies or bipolar disorder-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jing Guo, Yan Liu, Lingling Kong, Yaoyao Sun, Zhe Lu, Tianlan Lu, Haiying Qu, Weihua Yue

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jing GuoPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China.
Yan LiuDepartment of Psychology, Medical Humanities Research Center, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China.
Lingling KongDepartment of Psychology, Medical Humanities Research Center, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China.
Yaoyao SunPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China.
Zhe LuPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China.
Tianlan LuPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China.
Haiying QuDepartment of Psychology, Medical Humanities Research Center, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China.
Weihua YuePeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China.
Binzhou Medical University · CNBinzhou University · CNPeking University Sixth Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients treated with anticonvulsant mood stabilizers have a higher incidence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, there is no comparison between different anticonvulsant mood stabilizers. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the prevalence of PCOS in women taking anticonvulsant mood stabilizers and compare the probability of PCOS caused by different anticonvulsant mood stabilizers. Methods: Five databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials, were searched for literature on anticonvulsant mood stabilizers and PCOS published up to October 28, 2022. This meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4, Stata 14.0, and R4.1.0, and effect size pooling was performed in fixed- or random-effects models based on the results of Results: Twenty studies with a total of 1,524 patients were included in a single-arm analysis, which showed a combined effect size (95% CI) of 0.21 (0.15-0.28) for PCOS in patients taking anticonvulsant mood stabilizers. Nine controlled studies, including 500 patients taking medication and 457 healthy controls, were included in a meta-analysis, which showed OR = 3.23 and 95% CI = 2.19-4.76 for PCOS in women taking anticonvulsant mood stabilizers. Sixteen studies with a total of 1416 patients were included in a network meta-analysis involving four drugs, valproate (VPA), carbamazepine (CBZ), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and lamotrigine (LTG), and the results of the network meta-analysis showed that VPA (OR = 6.86, 95% CI = 2.92-24.07), CBZ (OR = 3.28, 95% CI = 0.99-12.64), OXC (OR = 4.30, 95% CI = 0.40-49.49), and LTG (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 0.16-10.30), with cumulative probabilities ranked as VPA (90.1%), OXC (63.9%), CBZ (50.1%), and LTG (44.0%). Conclusion: The incidence of PCOS was higher in female patients treated with anticonvulsant mood stabilizers than in the healthy population, with VPA having the highest likelihood of causing PCOS. The most recommended medication when considering PCOS factors is LTG. Systematic review registration: identifier: CRD42022380927.

Indexed as

carbamazepinelamotriginemood stabilizersoxcarbazepinePCOSvalproate

Identifiers

PMID37229383
PMCPMC10203219
OpenAlexW4378347426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.