Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37235559›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Isolation of porcine adult cardiomyocytes: Comparison between Langendorff perfusion and tissue slicing-assisted enzyme digestion.

Xun Shi, Xiaoli Tang, Fang Yao, Le Wang, Mingzhi Zhang, Xin Wang, Guangxin Yue, Li Wang, Shengshou Hu, Bingying Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xun ShiState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaoli TangState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Fang YaoShenzhen Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Le WangState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Mingzhi ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xin WangDivision of Prevention and Community Health, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Disease, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Guangxin YueState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Center for Cardiovascular Experimental Study and Evaluation, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pre-clinical Research and Evaluation for Cardiovascular Implant Materials, Animal Experimental Center, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College.
Li WangState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shengshou HuState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Bingying ZhouState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9581-5768
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue slicing-assisted digestion (TSAD) of adult cardiomyocytes has shown significant improvements over conventional chunk methods. However, it remains unclear how this method compares to Langendorff perfusion, the current standard of adult cardiomyocyte isolation. Using adult Bama minipigs, we performed cardiomyocyte isolation via these two distinct methods, and compared the resulting cellular quality, including viability, cellular structure, gene expression, and electrophysiological properties, of cardiomyocytes from 3 distinct anatomical regions, namely the left ventricle, right ventricle, and left atrial appendage. Our results revealed largely indistinguishable cell quality in all of the measured parameters. These findings suggest that that TSAD can be reliably used to isolate adult mammalian cardiomyocytes as a reliable alternative to perfusion in cardiomyocyte isolation from larger mammals, particularly when Langendorff perfusion is not feasible.

Indexed as

DigestionMyocytes, CardiacAnimalsCell SeparationPerfusionSwineSwine, Miniature

Identifiers

PMID37235559
PMCPMC10218724
OpenAlexW4378470159

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.