Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237092›Full record

ReviewCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2023

Expecting the unexpected: a review of learning under uncertainty across development.

Selin Topel, Ili Ma, Jan Sleutels, Henk van Steenbergen, Ellen R A de Bruijn, Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Flexible learning in complex worlds.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Selin TopelLeiden University, Institute of Psychology, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333, AK, Leiden, The Netherlands. s.topel@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
Ili MaLeiden University, Institute of Psychology, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333, AK, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jan SleutelsLeiden University, Institute of Psychology, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333, AK, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Henk van SteenbergenLeiden University, Institute of Psychology, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333, AK, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ellen R A de BruijnLeiden University, Institute of Psychology, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333, AK, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anna C K van DuijvenvoordeLeiden University, Institute of Psychology, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333, AK, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many of our decisions take place under uncertainty. To successfully navigate the environment, individuals need to estimate the degree of uncertainty and adapt their behaviors accordingly by learning from experiences. However, uncertainty is a broad construct and distinct types of uncertainty may differentially influence our learning. We provide a semi-systematic review to illustrate cognitive and neurobiological processes involved in learning under two types of uncertainty: learning in environments with stochastic outcomes, and with volatile outcomes. We specifically reviewed studies (N = 26 studies) that included an adolescent population, because adolescence is a period in life characterized by heightened exploration and learning, as well as heightened uncertainty due to experiencing many new, often social, environments. Until now, reviews have not comprehensively compared learning under distinct types of uncertainties in this age range. Our main findings show that although the overall developmental patterns were mixed, most studies indicate that learning from stochastic outcomes, as indicated by increased accuracy in performance, improved with age. We also found that adolescents tended to have an advantage compared with adults and children when learning from volatile outcomes. We discuss potential mechanisms explaining these age-related differences and conclude by outlining future research directions.

Indexed as

Social EnvironmentAdolescentAdultChildHumansUncertaintyAdolescenceDecision-makingLearningStochasticityUncertaintyVolatility

Identifiers

PMID37237092
PMCPMC10390612

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.