Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37245196›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2023

The effect of four weeks blood flow restricted resistance training on macro- and micro-vascular function in healthy, young men.

Masahiro Horiuchi, Lee Stoner, Jillian Poles

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06596304 (Comparing Macro- and Microvascular Responses to Acute Resistance Exercise with and Without Blood Flow Restriction in Young and Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06596304 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparing Macro- and Microvascular Responses to Acute Resistance Exercise with and Without Blood Flow Restriction in Young and Older Adults: a Parallel Group Crossover Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEgas Moniz - Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, CRLRan2024 to 2025Enrolled52ConditionsAgeing, Blood Flow RestrictionArmsLow intensity-resistance training with lower limb blood flow restriction, High Intensity Resistance Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Masahiro HoriuchiFaculty of Sports and Life Science, National Institute of Fitness and Sports in KANOYA, Shiromizu 1, Kanoya, Kagoshima, 8912393, Japan. mhoriuchi@nifs-k.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5784-5694
Lee StonerDepartment of Exercise and Sports Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-8700, USA.
Jillian PolesDepartment of Exercise and Sports Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-8700, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNational Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K11012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the macrovascular and microvascular function responses to resistance training with blood flow restriction (BFR) compared to high-load resistance training (HLRT) control group.

methodsTwenty-four young, healthy men were randomly assigned to BFR or HLRT. Participants performed bilateral knee extensions and leg presses 4 days per week, for 4 weeks. For each exercise, BFR completed 3 X 10 repetitions/day at 30% of 1-repetition max (RM). The occlusive pressure was applied at 1.3 times of individual systolic blood pressure. The exercise prescription was identical for HLRT, except the intensity was set at 75% of one repetition maximum. Outcomes were measured pre-, at 2- and 4-weeks during the training period. The primary macrovascular function outcome was heart-ankle pulse wave velocity (haPWV), and the primary microvascular function outcome was tissue oxygen saturation (StO

resultsKnee extension and leg press 1-RM increased by 14% for both groups. There was a significant interaction effect for haPWV, decreasing - 5% (Δ-0.32 m/s, 95% confidential interval [CI] - 0.51 to - 0.12, effect size [ES] =  - 0.53) for BFR and increasing 1% (Δ0.03 m/s, 95%CI - 0.17 to 0.23, ES = 0.05) for HLRT. Similarly, there was an interaction effect for StO

conclusionThe current findings suggest that BFR may improve macro- and microvascular function compared to HLRT.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingExerciseHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthPulse Wave AnalysisRegional Blood FlowArterial stiffnessBlood pressureNear infrared spectroscopyPulse wave velocityReactive hyperemia

Identifiers

PMID37245196
OpenAlexW4378569145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.